期刊文献+

“回归文本”——略论美国文学研究转向中的“理论”与“文本” 被引量:2

"Returning to the Text" ——on"Theroy"and"Text"in the Convertion of American Literary Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对近年来美国文学研究中出现的"回归文本"这一重要转向,通过简略梳理"传统研究思路——理论转向——文本转向"这一线索,审视"文本"与"理论"这一组关键概念所指向的文学研究方法和思路发生的变化、以及两者之间互动关系的变化。目的在于说明,"文本"与"理论"之间并不存在非此即彼的简单对立关系;而文本转向之后理论的意义就在于,在打破思维惯性的基础上提供切入或重新发现文本的方法。 Aiming at the convertion of"returning to the text"in recent American literary study,the es-say reviews the change in approaches and thinking of literary study that"text"and"theory"signify,as well as the change in their relationship.The article attempts to deny the opposition between"text"and"theory".After "returning to the text","theory"makes sense by providing approaches to rediscovering texts on the basis of breaking thinking habits.
作者 杨彬彬
出处 《江苏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期140-144,共5页 Jiangsu Social Sciences
关键词 “文本” “理论” “回归文本” 美国文学研究转向 "text" "theory" "returning to the text" the convertion of American literary study
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Monica F. Cohen, Professional Domesticity in the Victorian Novel: Women, Work, and Home (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  • 2Mary L. Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984).
  • 3Valerie Sanders, Eve's Renegades: Victorian Anti-Feminist Women Novelists (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996).
  • 4(美)孙康宜.西方性别理论在汉学研究中的运用和创新.台大历史学报,2001,(28).
  • 5本尼迪克特·安德森.《想象的共同体:民族主义的起源与散布》[M].上海人民出版社,2003年版.第170页.
  • 6Peter Brooks, "Must We Apologize?" Comparative Literature in the Age of Muhicuhuralism, ed., Charles Bernheimer (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995) p.97.
  • 7Charles Bemheimer, "The Bernheimer Report, 1993: Comparative Literature at the Turn of the Century," Comparative Literature in the Age of Muhiculturalism, ed., Charles Bemheimer (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995) p.39-47.
  • 8Jonathan Culler, "Comparative Literature, At Last! " Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism, ed., Charles Bernheimer (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995) p. 118.
  • 9Peter Brooks, "Must We Apologize?", p.101-102, p.103.

共引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部