国内翻译界对创造性叛逆的误读

The Misconception and Abuse of Creative Treason from the Domestic Translation Studies

"创造性叛逆"从描述翻译研究的角度出发,总结出文学翻译的一般规律,是特定文化、特定历史时期的文学翻译事实。然而国内翻译界不少学者在接受和运用这一概念时产生了种种误读:混淆了翻译的规定性和描述性两种研究范式;认为"创造性叛逆"脱离了实践;认为"创造性叛逆"提倡胡译、乱译,解构忠实;认为"创造性叛逆"的主体只是译者。通过对误读现象进行剖析,文章指出误读主要源于描述性和规定性两种研究范式的混淆,学者的断章取义,概念本身的表述不清及学科界限模糊四个方面。

Creative treason gives the summarization of common rules of literary translation from the descriptive translation studies＇ perspective and is a literary translation fact in a special cultural and historical period. Hownomena, the thesis points out that the confusion of two paradigms of translation studies ： descriptive and prescriptive, scholars＇ quoting out of context, the ambiguity of the concept and the blur of disciplines＇ bounds all contribute to the misunderstanding and criticism of creative treason.