期刊文献+

当代西方教育史学的发展 被引量:6

The Development of the Postwar Western Historiography of Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的西方教育史学主要是近代师范教育的产物,以直线进步史观描述近代民族国家学校教育的发展并关注大教育家的思想。在战后国际史学两次转向和师范教育机构转型的双重夹击下,传统西方教育史学模式发生了两次嬗变:20世纪50年代末在历史学社会科学化潮流的影响下向新社会史方向发展,在美国率先出现了新教育史学,几年后影响到欧美其他国家。20世纪80年代以后受新文化史学的影响,在英美等国出现了新文化教育史学,后逐渐向欧美其他国家发展。进入21世纪,一方面,运用传统教育史学模式研究教育史的仍大有人在,许多教育史家为捍卫教育史学的独立性而努力;另一方面,新文化史取向的教育史学与新社会史学取向的教育史学既相互博弈又取长补短,形成了战后西方教育史学三足鼎立和多元化发展的态势。 As a result of the development of modern teacher education, the traditional western historiography of education is characterized by describing the school education of modern nation states and the thoughts of great educators through a linearly progressive historical perspective. Under the double influences from the two transformations undergone by historical studies worldwide and from the restructuring of the educational institutions in the postwar era, the traditional western historiography of education has made two shifts in its paradigm: in the 1950s it followed the trend of adapting the historical studies to the paradigm of social sciences and developed into a new paradigm of sociological historiography, resulting in the appearance of a new educational historiography firstly in America, which later influenced other countries; in the 1980s, the rise of new cultural historiography led to the emergence of a new cultural educational historiography in Britain and America, which later spread to other western countries. In the 21st century, on the one hand, there are still supporters of the traditional paradigm of educational historiography, who are striving for the independence of the traditional paradigm; but on the other, the new cultural educational historiography and the new sociological-oriented historiography, each emulating and complementing the other, contribute to the formation of the postwar pluralistic situation in which the three different paradigms of educational historiography co-exist with each other.
作者 周采
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期67-73,共7页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部社科规划基金项目(08JA880037)
关键词 战后西方教育史学 嬗变 多元发展 postwar western educational historiography transformation pluralistic development
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Axelrod, P. Historical Writing and Canadian Education from the 1970s to the 1990s. History of Education Quarterly, 1996(36).
  • 2Vick, M. Individuals and Social Structure: Recent Writings in the History of Education in Australia. History of Education Quarterly, 1987( 1 ).
  • 3Theobald, M. R. The Accomplished Woman and the Propriety of Intellect: A New Look at Women's Education in Britain and Australia, 1800-1850. History of Education, 1988(17).
  • 4[法]安多旺·莱昂.当代教育史[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1989.
  • 5Jarausch, K. H The Old "New History of Education" : A German Reconsideration. History of Education Quarterly, 1986(2).
  • 6伊格尔斯.二十世纪的历史学[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2006.
  • 7景德祥.联邦德国社会史学派与文化史学派的争议——20世纪末联邦德国史学流派争议[J].史学理论研究,2005(3):112-120. 被引量:6
  • 8杜芳琴,裔昭印,刘文明,李银河,郑永福,吕美颐.妇女史与社会性别的启示[J].史学理论研究,2004(3):4-8. 被引量:27
  • 9Purvis, J. The Historiography of British Education: A Feminist Critique. In Ali Rattansi & David Reeder (eds.), Rethinking Radical Education: Essays in Honour of Brian Simon. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1992.
  • 10Heward, C. Public School Masculinities: An Essay in Gender and Power. In G. R. Walford ( ed. ), Private Schools : Tradition, Change and Diversity. London: Chapman, 1991.

二级参考文献68

  • 1U. Daniel, W. Hardtwig/H. - U. Wehler (Hg.), Kulturgeschichte Heute, in Archiv fiir Sozialgeschichte, 38 (1998),S. 675--677, S. 675.
  • 2G, G, Iggers, Geschichtswissenschaft im 20.Jahrhumdert.Goettingen 1993,S.74
  • 3W. Schulze (Hg.), Sozialgeschichte, Alltagsgeschichte, Mikrohistorie, Goettingen 1994, S. 8.
  • 4U.Daniel,Clio unter Kulturschock.Zu aktuellen Debatten der Geschichtswissenschaft,in Geschichte in Wissenschuft und Unterricht,48(1997),S.195-218,S.259-278,S.196-197
  • 5E. Hanisch, Die linguistische Wende.Geschichtswissenschaft und Literatur,in W.Hardtwig/H.-U.Wehler(Hg.)Kulturgeschichte Hente,Goettingen 1996,S.213-230,S.226
  • 6H. - U. Wehler, All tagsgeschichte. Koenigsweg zur neuen Ufer oder Irrgarten der Illusionen? in Wehler, Aus der Geschichte lernen ? Aufsateze, Muenchen 1988, S. 130---151 ,S. 132.
  • 7R. Vierhaus, Die Rekonstruktion historischer Lebenswehen. Probleme modemer Kulturgeschichtsschreibung, in H.Lehmann (Hg.), Wege zu einer neuen Kulturgeschichte, Goettingen 1995, S. 6--28, S. 16.
  • 8C. Conrad u. M. Kessel ( Hg. ), Geschichte schreiben in der Postmoderne, Einletung: Geschichte ohne Zentrum,Stuttgart 1994年版, S. 9--36.
  • 9T. Nipperdey, Wehlers "Kaiserreich", in Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 1 (1975), S. 539---560, S.543.
  • 10T. Nipperdey,Die anthropologische Dimension der Geschichtswissenschaft, in G. Schulz (Hg.),Geschichte heute,Goettingen 1973,S.225-255

共引文献40

同被引文献91

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部