期刊文献+

分析哲学语境中的“我思故我在”——欣提卡诠释的突破与困境

"Cogito,ergo sum" in the context of analytical philosophy——breakthrough and dilemma of Hintikka's interpretation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 雅克·欣提卡在诠释笛卡尔的"我思故我在"命题时创造了一种新的范式——践言性诠释。在这种诠释中,"我思"被解释为一种与"言语行为"逻辑同构的思想行为,"我思"的功能则被阐释为"我在心灵中对自己说‘我不存在’",因而"我在"自身得以确证,"我思"命题成立。欣提卡关于自我是通过他人的目光得以确证这一最具革命性的观点,后来虽有修正,但为继续探寻"我思"命题开辟了新的途径。 Jaakko Hintikka created a new paradigm in the domain of interpretation on the "Cogito,ergo sum" proposition,namely the Performatory Interpretation.According to this interpretation,cogito was explained as a thought-act,which had the same logical structure with the speech-act.The most revolutionary point of view of Hintikka was that "I" (or "ego") were self-verified through others in the ordinary language game,which had been revised to a certain extent later,but the fundamental point of view had led to a number of views contrary to Descartes.Thus,Hintikka had openeda new path for the paradigm.
作者 李曦
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第5期587-591,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 笛卡尔 雅克·欣提卡 我思 我在 践言性诠释 Descartes Jaakko Hintikka Cogito ergosum the performatory interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Peter Markie. The Cogito and its importance[C]//John Cottingham. The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • 2韩东晖.践言冲突方法与哲学范式的重新奠基[J].中国社会科学,2007(3):67-76. 被引量:7
  • 3Jaakko Hintikka. Cogito, Ergo Sum as an Inference and a Performance[J]. The Philosophical Review, 1962, 71(1): 3-32.
  • 4Jaakko Hintikka. Cogito, Ergo Sum as an Inference and aPerformance[J]. The Philosophical Review, 1963, 72(4): 487-496.
  • 5Jaakko Hintikka. Cogito, Ergo Quis Est?[J]. Revue Intemationale De Philosophie, 1996, 50(195): 5-21.
  • 6Fred Feldman. On the Performatory Interpretation of the Cogito[J]. The Philosophical Review, 1973, 82(3): 345-363.
  • 7李红,韩东晖.究竟什么是“不可说”的——对维特根斯坦《逻辑哲学论》的扩展性解读[J].哲学研究,2005(8):64-68. 被引量:11
  • 8科廷汉姆.哲学及其历史[C]//欧阳康.当代英美哲学地图.北京:人民出版社,2005.
  • 9笛卡尔.第一哲学沉思集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986..

二级参考文献42

  • 1康德 邓晓芒译.《纯粹理性批判》[M].人民出版社,2004年.第471页.
  • 2维特根斯坦 贺绍甲译.《逻辑哲学论》[M].商务印书馆,2002年.第102、105页.
  • 3哈贝马斯.《交往行为理论》第1卷[M].上海人良出版社,2004年版.第69页.
  • 4维特根斯坦 陈启伟译.《逻辑哲学论》[A].涂纪亮主编.《维特根斯坦全集》第1卷[C].河北教育出版社,2003年..
  • 5J. L. Austin, Howto Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976, p. 67.
  • 6J. R. Searle, How Performatives Work. Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 5, 1989, pp. 535-- 558.
  • 7克里斯特尔编.《现代语言学词典》,沈家煊译,商务印书馆,2000年,第79、262页.
  • 8D. Robinson, Introducing Performative Pragmatics. London: Routledge, 2006, p. 14.
  • 9J. L. Austin, Philosophical Papers (3rd ed.), Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 1979, p. 189.
  • 10B. Smith (ed.), John Searle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 60

共引文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部