期刊文献+

现代汉语受事宾语句中配项的匹配规律研究

On Rules of Item Pairing in Modern Chinese Patient Object Clauses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文系统分析了汉语受事宾语句中配项的匹配规律。配项匹配类型方面,各类配项之间的匹配情况可用"适配度"序列表示。配项匹配数量方面,无施事匹配句中单配项匹配式明显多于双配项匹配式,单配项以处所最常见;双配项匹配式处所必现;三配项及三配项以上匹配式中,施事必现,且必须是高生命度名词。一些句式排斥一些配项匹配和限制匹配数量。"一句一例"原则制约了配项匹配类型,而句式压模功能限制了配项数量。不同语体中配项"适配度"和最优选匹配式也有差别。 The article systematically analyses rules and mechanism of item pairing in modern Chinese patient object clauses. The collocation degree sequence is adopted to indicate the different item pairing types. In terms of item pairing numbers,one-item sentences are apparently more than double-item sentences in non-agent sentences. The item indicating place is the most common type in one-item sentences,and the item indicating place is indispensable in non-agent double-item sentences. The agent must be a noun with the high degree of animacy in three and more items sentences. Some sentence patterns repel certain item pairing and limit the item pairing numbers. "One Case One NP" principle confines item pairing types and "Sentence constraining mode" function confines the pairing numbers. The item collocation degree and the prior pairing sequences in different writing style are quite different.
作者 朱军
出处 《暨南大学华文学院学报》 CSSCI 2009年第3期68-77,共10页 Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan University
基金 国家社科基金项目"汉语语体语法研究"(09CYY034)
关键词 配项匹配 匹配类型 适配度 匹配数量 优选匹配式 item pairing pairing type collocation degree pairing number the prior pairing sequences
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献31

  • 1陶红印.试论语体分类的语法学意义[J].当代语言学,1999,1(3):15-24. 被引量:211
  • 2陶红印.从“吃”看动词论元结构的动态特征[J].语言研究,2000,20(3):21-38. 被引量:93
  • 3张伯江.施事角色的语用属性[J].中国语文,2002(6):483-494. 被引量:71
  • 4廖秋忠.现代汉语中动词的支配成分的省略[J].中国语文,1984,(4):241-247.
  • 5Longacre, Robert E. 1983 The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
  • 6McEnery, A. and Zhonghua Xiao 2004 The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evahtation (LREC) 2004, 1175-1178. Lisbon, May 24-30, 2004.
  • 7Myhill, John and Zhiqun Xing 1993 The discourse functions of patient fronting: A comparative study of Biblical Hebrew and Chinese. Linguistics, 31.1:25-57.
  • 8Myhill, John and Zhiqun Xing 1996 Towards an operational definition of discourse contrast. Studies in Language, 20.2: 303-360.
  • 9Perlmutter, David. M. 1978 Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society: 157-189.
  • 10Sun, Chaofen and Talmy Givon. 1985 On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61.2:329-351.

共引文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部