期刊文献+

市场分割下红筹股与A股的财务绩效及公司治理 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对目前中国股市市场分割状态下计划回归的红筹股公司与A股公司的财务绩效与公司治理结构进行了比较。研究表明:(1)红筹股公司相对于A股公司而言,具有显著更大的资产规模、营业收入规模,红筹股公司亦具有显著高于A股公司的净资产报酬率。这些比较显示,红筹股公司具有显著更优的盈利能力。(2)虽然仅从股权结构、董事会组成的比例和数量方面没有找到红筹股公司优于A股公司的治理结构的经验证据,但由于公司治理还客观上受到其它内部、外部治理结构变量因素的替代性影响,特别是香港这一高度成熟市场的监管机制对上市公司严格的监管作用,所以红筹股公司的治理结构仍然应该优于A股公司。因此,在存在市场分割的现实环境下,规模更大、绩效更优的红筹股公司回归A股市场,有利于提高A股上市公司的整体质量和投资价值,从而降低泡沫风险。
作者 刘澎
出处 《求索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期29-31,共3页 Seeker
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目<贯彻落实科学发展观与完善开放型经济体系研究>(07&ZD017)
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Stulz H M. On the effects ot barriers to international investment. Journal of Finance, 1981, 36:923 -934.
  • 2Errunza V, E losq. International asset pricing under mild segmentation: Theory and test. Journal of Finance, 1985, 40:105 -124.
  • 3Eun, C.S. and S. Janakiramanan. A model of international asset pricing with a constraint on the foreign equity ownership. Journal of Finance, 1986,41:897 - 914.
  • 4Alexander, Gordon J, C. Eun, and Janakiramanan S. Asset Pricing and Dual Listing on Foreign Capital Markets: A Note. Journal of Finance, 1987, 42(1) :151 -158.
  • 5Hietala P. Asset pricing in partially segmented markets: Evidence from the Finnish market. Journal of Finance, 1989, 44:697 718.
  • 6张人骥,贾万程.中国市场分割下的多贝它资本资产定价模型——理论模型及实证检验[J].金融研究,2005(10):32-41. 被引量:10
  • 7吴战篪.解释与证据:基于估值理念差异下的A股与H股价差[J].财经科学,2007(6):16-23. 被引量:7

二级参考文献24

  • 1王国刚.中国股市定价权不容外移[J].财贸经济,2005,26(3):3-8. 被引量:9
  • 2B. H. Solnik. “An Equilibrium Model of the International Capital Market. ”Journal of Economic Theory (1974), 500 - 524.
  • 3Cheol S. Eun, Stijn Claessens, and Kwang W.Jun “International Trade of Assets,Pricing Externalities,and the Cost of Capital”,in: “Portfolio Investment in Developing Country”, World Bank publication.
  • 4Cheol S. Eun and Janakiramanan “A Model of International Asset Pricing with a Constraint on the Foreign Equity Ownership”,Journal of Finanace (1986) 897-914.
  • 5E. Fama. Foundations of Finance. New York:Basic Books Inc., 1976.
  • 6F. Black “international Capital Market Equilibrium with Investment Barriers.” Journal of Financial Eonomics 1 (December 1974)337 - 352.
  • 7Rene M.stulz “On the Effects of Barriers to International Investment”, Journal of Finance ( 1981 ), 923 - 934.
  • 8R.Roll.“A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests."Journal of Financial Economics 4 (1977) 129- 176.
  • 9R. Stehle. “An Erapirical Test of the Alternative Hypotheses of National and International Pricing of Risky Asset.” Journal of Finance 32(1977), 493 - 502.
  • 10R.Stulz. “A Model of International Asset Pricing.” Journal of Financial Economics (1981) 383 -403.

共引文献15

同被引文献9

  • 1任佩瑜,范集湘,黄璐,张蓓.中国新型公司治理结构模式及其绩效评价——以中国水电集团为例的研究[J].中国工业经济,2005(7):96-104. 被引量:24
  • 2Pettigrew, A, M : On studying managerial elites [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13 : 163 - 182.
  • 3Daily, C. , Dalton, D. R, & Cannella, A. A. , Jr. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(3) :371 -382.
  • 4Davis, J. H. , Schoorman, F. d. , & Donaldson, L. Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22 : 20- 47.
  • 5Borm, Joel A. C. , & Korn, H. J. Dynamics of Dyadic Competitive Interaction[ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20:251 - 278.
  • 6Minzberg, H. , Bruce Ahlstrand, Joseph Lampel. Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management [ M ]. The Free Press. 1998:185 - 192.
  • 7Chen M. J, Smith K. G, & Grimm C. M.. Action characteristics as predictors of responses [ J ]. Management Science, 1992, 38 : 439 - 455.
  • 8Chen M. J.. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry : Toward a theoretical integration [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21 : 100- 134.
  • 9曾江洪,丁宁.董事会治理对中小上市公司成长性影响的实证研究[J].求索,2008(5):29-31. 被引量:8

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部