摘要
介绍了应用层次分析法(AHP)和网络分析法(ANP)评估渡河方式的基本步骤,以确定某舟桥单位遂行抗洪抢险任务的渡河方式为例,进行实例验证。结果表明,应用ANP比应用AHP更加贴近实际工作,漕渡门桥的综合保障效能要优于浮桥的保障效能。
Introduce the basic process of evaluation crossing mode by the way of both Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). To determine the ways of certain flood fighting and rescue units carry out the task to cross the crossing mode as an example, and processed test and verify. The result shows, using ANP is more practical than AHP, the integrated support efficiency of ferrying raft is better than floating bridge.
出处
《兵工自动化》
2009年第12期18-21,共4页
Ordnance Industry Automation
关键词
层次分析法
网络分析法
决策科学
渡河方式
方案评估
AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)
ANP (Analytic Network Process)
Decision science
Crossing mode
Alternatives evaluation