期刊文献+

单节段融合双节段置入物固定B型胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的生物力学研究 被引量:4

Biomechanical studies of single segmental spinal interbody fusion with bisegment fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture type B
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:胸腰椎爆裂骨折Dennis分型B型伤椎下位椎间盘无明显损伤,为了减少融合节段,保留正常间盘,单节段椎体融合(伤椎与上位椎体)手术方式已有人提出,但由于伤椎本身的损伤,切除部分椎体后置入固定螺钉容易松动,甚至无法固定。而将固定螺钉置入伤椎下位椎体,通过单节段融合双节段固定来稳定脊柱,是否完全可行尚无定论。目的:从生物力学角度观察单节段融合双节段置入物固定B型胸腰椎爆裂骨折的可行性。设计、时间及地点:随机分组设计,体外对比观察,于2007-06/2008-06在南方医科大学生物力学实验室完成。材料:取7~9月龄新鲜冰冻家猪胸腰椎标本(T13~L3节段)20具,其中10具为完整标本,10具为通过预损伤逐级撞击法制备的L1爆裂性骨折B型标本。方法:收集新鲜猪T13~L3节段胸腰椎标本,建立胸腰椎爆裂性骨折B型模型。实验分为4组,完整标本组(n=10):新鲜猪T13~L3节段标本;失稳组(n=10):采用预损伤逐级撞击法制备的L1爆裂性骨折B型标本;切除一椎间盘内固定组(n=10):失稳组经生物力学检测后,切除伤椎上位椎间盘连同椎体上1/2,取髂骨植骨,使用山东威高骨科材料有限公司U-FRONT胸腰椎前路双棒系统侧前方固定T14~L2椎体。切除两椎间盘内固定组(n=10):将切除一椎间盘内固定组检测后切除伤椎及下位椎间盘,髂骨植骨,用威高U-FRONT系统前侧方固定T14~L2椎体。植骨块长度比植骨区长1mm。主要观察指标:在三维运动试验机上检测并记录加载力矩为10N?m时各组T14~L2节段前屈、后伸、左右侧弯、轴向旋转的三维运动范围。结果:失穏组在伸屈、左右侧弯、轴向旋转方面表现出明显不稳,运动范围与完整标本组相比均明显增大(P<0.01)。切除一椎间盘内固定组及切除两椎间盘内固定组初始稳定性则有明显提高,伸屈、左右侧弯、轴向旋转运动范围与失稳组相比亦明显减小(P<0.05);两组标本伸屈、左右侧弯的运动范围与完整标本相比均明显减少,而轴向旋转运动范围明显增加(P<0.05)。切除一椎间盘内固定组轴向旋转小于切除两椎间盘内固定组(P<0.05)。结论:单节段融合双节段固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折B型,在前屈、后伸、左右侧弯方向均有良好的初始稳定性,左右旋转初始稳定性较传统的切除两椎间盘伤椎次全切植骨内固定明显提高。 BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar burst fracture Dennis type B does not have significant damage in the intervertebral discs of the inferior vertebral body. To reduce fusion segment and remain normal intercalated disc, single discectomy (damaged vertebral body and supervisor vertebral body) is proposed, but because of the damage to the vertebral body, implanted screw is easy to loose following excising partial vertebral body, even cannot be fixed. However, it is still unknown whether implanted screw in the inferior vertebral body of the damaged vertebral body was stabilized using two segment discectomy with fixation. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the feasibility of single segmental spinal interbody fusion with bisegment fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture type B. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: The randomized controlled in vitro study was conducted at the Laboratory of Biomechanics, Southern Medical University from June 2007 to June 2008. MATERIALS: A total of 20 fresh freezing 7-9 months pig samples (T13-L3 segment) were used, comprising 10 integral samples and 10 L1 type B thoracolumbar burst fracture samples prepared by pre-injury and weight dropping technique. METHODS: Pig fresh thoracolumbar specimens from T13-L3 were collected to create models of type B thoracolumbar burst fracture. There were 4 groups in this study. Ten of them were selected as intact group (n=10) (fresh pig T13-L3 segment). T1 vertebral endplate pre-injury and weight dropping technique and incremental trauma approach were used. Denis' type B burst fracture was produced, and ten of them were selected as unstable group (n=10). Firstly, unstable group was decompressed by discectomy and semivertebraectomy in upper half of the vertebral body, single level was fused with lilac and U-FRONT anterior thoracolumbar system were placed between T14 and L2, as single discectomy with fixation group (n=10). Then lower disc of injury vertebra discectomy and vertebraectomy, fused with lilac U-FRONT anterior thoracolumbar system were placed between T14 and L2, as two segment discectomy with fixation group (n=10). The bone graft was longer 1 mm than the bone graft region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The flexion: extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation range of motion (ROM) of T14-L2 were measured in each group on the spinal three-motional test machine at 10 N·m. RESULTS: The flexion, extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation were not stable in the unstable group. ROM was significantly increased in the unstable group compared with the intact group (P 〈 0.01). The primary stability was significantly elevated in the single discectomy with fixation and two segment discectomy with fixation groups. The flexion, extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation ROM were significantly reduced in the single discectomy with fixation and two segment discectomy with fixation groups compared with the unstable group (P 〈 0.05). The flexion, extension, right/left lateral bending ROM was significantly decreased in the two groups compared with the intact group, but axial rotation ROM was significantly increased (P 〈 0.05). Axial rotation ROM was smaller in the single discectomy with fixation group compared with the two segment discectomy with fixation group (P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSION: Single segmental spinal interbody fusion with bisegment fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture type B had a good immediate stability in flexion, extension, lateral bending motion. Compared with traditional partial corpectomy L1 between the caudal and cranial endplate of the adjacent vertebrae with bisegmental fixation, it had a better immediate stability in axial rotation.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第39期7639-7642,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(2009-YB-165)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1胡有谷 党耕町主译.脊柱外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.335-338.
  • 2van der Roer N,de Lange ES,Bakker FC,et al.Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures:a systematic review of the literature.Eur Spine J.2005;14(6):527-534.
  • 3Verlaan JJ,Diekerhof CH,Buskens E,et al.Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine:a systematic review of the literature on techniques,complications,and outcome.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2004;29(7):803-814.
  • 4Kaneda K.Taneichi H,Abumi K,et al.Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumDar DUrSt TractureS associated with neurological deficits.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1997;69-83.
  • 5The three column spine and significance in the classification of acute thoracoiumbar spinal injuries.Spine(rniia va 1976).983;8(8):817-831.
  • 6Denis F.pnansaDItiy as aerined by the tnree-columnspine concept in acute spinal trauma.iin Urthop Reiat Res.1utj4;(189):65-76.
  • 7Panjabi MM,Kifune M,Wen L,et al.Dynamic canal encroachment during thoracolumbar burst fractures.J Spinal Disord.1995;8(1):39-48.
  • 8Atlas SW.Redenboaen V,Rogers LF,et al.The radiographic characterization of burst tractures of the spine.AJR Am J Roentgenol.1986;147(3):575-582.
  • 9Miyakoshi N,Abe E,Shimada Y,et al.Anterior decompression with single segmental spinal interbody fusion for lumbar burst fracture.spine (Phila Pa 1976).1999;24(1):67-73.
  • 10刘浩,石锐,龚全,刘立岷.前路骨折椎体后上角切除椎管减压单节段固定融合治疗腰椎爆裂骨折的初期临床结果[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2007,21(10):1080-1083. 被引量:28

二级参考文献27

  • 1李佛保,郑召民.脊柱脊髓损伤的修复重建研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(4):324-330. 被引量:8
  • 2丁真奇,翟文亮,康两期,路迪生,林斌,郭志民,林坤山.异体股骨片支撑植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折合并截瘫[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(4):394-396. 被引量:12
  • 3任忠明,金才益,裴斐,黄志海,吴鹏.前路减压内固定修复严重胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(4):397-399. 被引量:12
  • 4李自耀,田宁,陈宝忠.经椎体侧后方椎体内植骨治疗胸腰段脊椎骨折12例[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(7):587-588. 被引量:2
  • 5Boeree N R, Harley J, Jackson R K, et al. Fixation of spinal fractures: can failure be predicted?[C]. Bristal: British Scoliosis Society Annual Meeting, 1994 : 58 - 61.
  • 6Lee C K, Langrana N A. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study[J]. Spine, 1984, 9(6) : 574 -581.
  • 7Chow D H, Luk K D, Evans J H, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments [J]. Spine, 1996, 21(5): 549-555.
  • 8Beaman D N, Graziano G P, Glover R A, et al. Substance P innervation of lumbar spine facet joints[J]. Spine, 1993, 18 (8) : 1044-1049.
  • 9Miyakoshi N , Abe E, Shimada Y, et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion [ J ]. Spine, 2000, 25(14) : 1837 - 1842.
  • 10Breeze S W, Doherty B J, Noble P S, et al. A biomechanical study of anterior thoracolumbar screw fixation [ J ]. Spine, 1998, 23 ( 17 ) : 1829 - 1831.

共引文献99

同被引文献45

  • 1刘尚礼,吕浩然(协助整理).重视胸腰段骨折治疗[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(1):5-7. 被引量:57
  • 2张俊杰,袁文,张竞,王新伟.保留后壁的颈椎椎体次全切除术的生物力学研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(5):377-379. 被引量:12
  • 3Atlas SW, Regenbogen V, Rogers LF, et al. The radiographic char- acterization of burst fractures of the spine. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 1986, 147: 575-582.
  • 4Frankel HI, Hancock DO, Hyslop C, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial manag ment of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia, 1969, 7: 179-192.
  • 5Frankel HI, Hancock DO, Hystop C, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial manag ment of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia, 1969, 7: 179-192.
  • 6Butt MF, Farooq M, Mir B, et al. Management of unstable thora- columbar spinal injuries by posterior short segment spinal fixation, lnt Orthop, 2007, 31: 259-264.
  • 7Knop C, Fabian HF, Bastian L, et al. Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting. Spine, 2001, 26: 88-99.
  • 8Muller U, Berlemann U. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic dificit by indirect reduction and posterior instru- mentation: bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion. EurSpine J, 1999, 8: 284-289.
  • 9Finkelstein JA, Wai EK, Jackson SS, et al. Single-level tlratinn of flexion distraction injuries. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16: 236-242.
  • 10Zou D, Yoo JU, Edwards WT, et al. Mechanics of anatnmic reduc- tion of thoracolumbar burst fractures: comparison of distraction versus distraction plus lordosis in the anatomic reduction of the thoracolumbarburst fracture. Spine, 1993, 18: 195-203.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部