1Reading Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. NAGB.U.S. Department of Education[EB/OL].http://nagb.org/frameworks/reading.2009.pdf.
3Keppel. F. National Educational Assessment: We Badly Need it. National Assessment: Pro and Con. American Association of School Administrators. Washington.D.C.1966. p5-7.
4Tyler, R.W. A Program of National Assessment. National Assessment: Pro and Con. American Association of School Administrators, Washington,D.C. 1966. p11-18.
5Ahmann,J.S,& John,G..H. National Assessment of Educational Progress. General Information Yearbook. Education Commission of the States, Denver, Colo. 1974. 09.
6Stedman, L.C. The NAEP Long-Term Trend Assessment: A Review of Its Transformation, Use, and Findings. Paoer Commissioned for the 20th Anniversary of the National Assessment Governing, Board 1988-2008. 2009. 02-3.
7Vinovskis,M.A. Overseeing the Nation's Report Card: the Creation and Evolution of the National Assessment Governing Board. Washington, DC: U.S. Deoartment ot Education. 1998. p8.
8National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Third National Mathematics Assessment; Results, trends, and issues. Denver,Colo: Education Commission of the States. 1983.p11.
9Pratt.T.B. National Assessment of Educational Progress. 1969-1983: A Bibliograohy of Documents in the ERIC Datebase. Denver:Education Commission of the States. 1983. pvi.
10Eugene,J.G.,&Christine, Y. NAEP Reconfigured: An Integrated Redesign of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Educational Testing.Service. Princeton,NJ:Westat, Inc.,Rockville.MD. 1997. 0202-204.
