滞针刺法治疗肩关节周围炎疗效观察

Observations on the Efficacy of Sticking of Needle in Treating Shoulder Periarthritis

目的观察常规针刺法与滞针刺法治疗肩周炎的疗效差异,寻找提高疗效的治疗方法。方法将132例肩周炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组用滞针刺法,对照组用常规针刺法,两组取穴和疗程均相同,观察其疗效差异。结果治疗组治愈率为71.6%,总有效率为97.0%;对照组治愈率为52.3%,总有效率为87.7%;分别比较两组的治愈率和总有效率,其差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前肩部疼痛和肩关节活动度分级比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后比较差异则有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论滞针刺法疗效优于常规针刺法疗效。

Objective To compare the efficacy of sticking of needle with conventional acupuncture in treating shoulder periarthritis and to find a more effective method. Methods One hundred and thirty-two patients with shoulder periarthritis were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 67 cases and a control group of 65 cases. The treatment group received a sticking of needle acupuncture method and the control group, a conventional acupuncture method. The same acupoints were selected in both groups and the course of treatment was the same. The therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups. Results The cure and marked efficacy rate was 76.1% in the treatment group and 52.3% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.05）. The total efficacy rate was 97.0% in the treatment group and 87.7% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.05）. After the treatment, the shoulder pain score and the shoulder range of motion scores were higher in the treatment group than in the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Sticking of needle is superior to conventional acupuncture in treating shoulder periarthritis.