期刊文献+

PCI患者和溶栓患者生活质量的影响因素及比较分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本文旨在探讨影响行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术(Percutaneous coronary interven-tion,PCI)及非PCI术急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)生活质量的相关因素。方法以随机抽样的方法对住院30例PCI术患者的生活质量进行调查,并随机抽取30例AMI患者作为对照组进行比较。运用一般资料问卷及心肌梗死多维度量表(MIDAS)进行问卷调查。所有资料均采用SPSS11.0统计软件处理。结果PCI组与非PCI组AMI患者出院前后生活质量MIDAS评分变化幅度的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。入院时射血分数(EF)、患者的年龄与行PCI术AMI患者入院时生活质量MIDAS评分存在负相关,出院后有效的自我管理、婚姻状况与行PCI术AMI患者出院后6个月生活质量MIDAS评分存在负相关。结论影响手术效果的因素在手术的不同阶段是不同的。医护人员应充分重视和利用有效因素,以提高患者的生活质量。
机构地区 无锡市人民医院
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2009年第20期2524-2525,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Waldecker B, Waas W, Haberbosch Wet al. Long--term follow- up after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary anglo --plasty for acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardial, 1998,32:1 320.
  • 2Thompson DR,Jenkinson C, Roebuck A, et al. Development and validation of a short measure of health status for individuals with acute myocardial infarction: The myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale(MIDAS)[J]. Quality of IAfe Research. 2002 . II(6) : sss-sas.
  • 3陆东风,熊龙根,刘世明,陈传荣,李昭骥,梁慧心,原潇.急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉成形术治疗的近期疗效[J].岭南心血管病杂志,2001,7(2):88-91. 被引量:2
  • 4刘宗军 金惠根.急性心肌梗塞后延迟PTCA及支架术对慢性左室重构和JG-,脏事件的影响.介入放射学杂志,2002,11(2):82-84.
  • 5Shelban I, Fragasso G, Lu C, et al. Influence of treatment delay on long--left ventricular fundbn in patients with actue Myocardial infarction successfully treated with primary angbplast [J]. Am Heart,2001,141:603--609.

二级参考文献6

  • 1The TIMI Stuely Group. TheThrombolysis in myocardial infraetion (TIMI) trial; phase L fiadins. N Engl J Med, 1985,312.932 ~ 936
  • 2Topol EJ. Goronary angioplasly for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med,1988, 109. 970 ~ 980
  • 3:6~74.Domanski MJ, Topol EJ. Cardiongenic shock: current wnderstandings andfutrre research direetion. Ann J Cardiol, 1994,74:724
  • 4Gunar RM, Cruz A, Boswell J, et al. Myocardial infarction with shock: hemodynamicstudies and results of therapy. Circulation. 1996, 33: 753
  • 5陈方,计乐群,温定国,沈宗林,方卫华.主动脉内气囊反搏对冠心病泵衰竭的治疗作用[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,1998,6(2):64-65. 被引量:27
  • 6陆东风,李昭骥,熊龙根,刘世明,李国强,许博裳,程麟令.急性心肌梗塞静脉溶栓后冠状动脉造影早期和晚期的改变[J].岭南心血管病杂志,1998,4(1):5-8. 被引量:1

共引文献1

同被引文献23

  • 1郝元涛,方积乾,李彩霞,史明丽.世界卫生组织生命质量量表及其中文版[J].中国社会医学杂志,1999,16(3):118-122. 被引量:80
  • 2饶中和,袁志敏.一种新的估测冠心病患者机体功能状态的调查表[J].国外医学(老年医学分册),1996,17(1):14-16. 被引量:95
  • 3Lyons RA,Lo SV,Littlepage BN. Comparative healthstatus of patients with 11 common illnesses in Wales[J].Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,1994,(04):388-390.
  • 4Charlier L,Dutrannois J,Kaufman L. The SF-36 Questionnaire:a convenient way to assess quality of lifein angina pectoris patients[J].ACTA CARDIOLOGICA,1997,(03):247-260.
  • 5Campbell NC,Thain J,Deans HG. Secondary prevention clinics forcoronary heart disease:randomized trial of effect on health[J].BMJ:British Medical Journal,1998,(7142):1434-1437.
  • 6Wiklund I,Herlitz J,Hjalmarson A. Quality of life inpostmyocardial jnfarction patients in relation to drug therpy[J].Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care,1989,(01):13-18.
  • 7Skinner JS,Albers CJ,Hall RJ. Comparison of Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) scores with exercised duration and measures of ischaemia during treadmill exercise testing in patients with coronary artery disease[J].EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL,1995,(11):1561-1565.
  • 8Visser MC,Fletcher AE,Parr G. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris:the Sickness Impact Profile,the Nottingham Health Profile,and the Quality of Well Being Scale[J].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,1994,(02):157-163.
  • 9Fletcher A,McLoone P,Bulpitt C. Quality of life onangina therapy:a randomised controlled trial of transdermalglyceryl trinitrat anginst placebo[J].LANCET,1988,(8601):4-8.
  • 10Johnson JA,Coons SJ. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample[J].Quality of Life Research,1998,(02):155-166.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部