期刊文献+

单纯全身麻醉和全身麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞对食管手术患者血流动力学的影响 被引量:5

Effect of the general anesthesia and compound anesthesia with epidural block on hemodynamics in patients undergoing esophageal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察单纯全身麻醉和全身麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞对食管手术患者血流动力学的影响。方法35例择期胸科食管手术患者随机分为全身麻醉组(GA组,17例)和全身麻醉+硬膜外阻滞组(GEA组,18例)。分别测定术前、术毕及术后24、48 h血流动力学相关参数。结果①毛细管血浆黏度及各切变率下全血黏度、全血还原黏度在术毕时均比术前明显降低(P<0.05,P<0.01),术后48 h时基本恢复到术前水平,组间比较无差异。②红细胞刚性指数、聚集指数:GEA组除术毕比术前明显降低外(P<0.05,P<0.01),其余各时点无明显变化;GA组无明显变化。③2组红细胞变形指数和电泳指数在48 h内无明显变化。结论单纯全身麻醉和全身麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞对术后的血黏度都具有一定的降低作用,但其作用一般不超过48 h。 Objective To investigate the influence of epidural analgesia and general anesthesia on hemodynamics in patients undergoing esophageal surgery. Methods 35 patients were randomly divided into two groups: general anesthesia group (group GA, n = 17 ), general anesthesia combined epidural anesthesia group (group CEA, n = 18). The hemodynamic parameters were monitored before anesthesia, at the end of operation as well as 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Results 1. Compared with the parameters before anesthesia, the microvascular plasma and whole blood viscosity significantly decreased (P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0.01 ) at various shear rates in both groups at the end of operation, and returned to the baseline level 48 hours after operation. 2. The red blood cell rigidity and aggregation index of group GEA obviously decreased (P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0.01 ) at the end of operation. No changes were observed at the other time points as well as in GA group. 3. No evident changes in erythrocyte morphology and electrophoresis index were observed within the postoperative 48 hours in the two groups. Conclusion Both general anesthesia and combined anesthesia with epidural block can reduce the blood viscosity, but on the whole its effect does not exceed 48 hours.
作者 邓燕 王建华
出处 《徐州医学院学报》 CAS 2009年第11期747-749,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
关键词 全身麻醉 硬膜外阻滞 血流动力学 general anesthesia epidural block hemodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献113

共引文献190

同被引文献28

  • 1谭焱,殷桂林,胡建才,朱水波,张晓明,王荣平,巴宁,刘孟丽.持续肋间神经阻滞与硬膜外阻滞对剖胸术后镇痛效果的对比研究[J].华南国防医学杂志,2005,19(3):4-6. 被引量:7
  • 2唐显玲,王春艳,李著华.全身麻醉对高血压病人围麻醉期血液流变性影响的临床研究[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2006,16(1):61-63. 被引量:15
  • 3嵇富海,张俊峰,蒋豪,薛张纲,杨建平.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉患者林格氏溶液的容量动力学[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(10):873-876. 被引量:3
  • 4Reinhart WH, Felix Ch. Influence of propofol on erythrocyte morphology, blood viscosity and platelet function [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2003, 29 ( 1 ) : 33-40.
  • 5Dogan IV, Ovali E, Eti Z, et al. The in vitro effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on platelet aggregation [J]. Anesth Analg, 1999, 88 (2): 432-436.
  • 6Kazama T,Ikeda K,Morita K.The pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses to skin incision,peritoneum incision,and abdominal wall retraction[J].Anesthesiology,1998,89(4):894-906.
  • 7Meune C. Drug management for coronary artery disease in theelderly[j]. Arch Mai Coeur Vaiss?2006,99(4) :35-39.
  • 8Ahonen J,Olkkola KT,Hynynen M, et al. Comparison of al-fentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthe-sia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypasssurgery[j], Br J Anaesth,2000,85(4) : 533-540.
  • 9Zhong, Jing,Ge, Sheng Jin,Zhuang, Xiao Feng,Cang, Jing,Xue, Zhang Gang.Effect of Intraoperative Amino Acid Infusion on Blood Glucose under General Anesthesia Combined with Epidural Block[J].Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism.2012(1)
  • 10Robert G. Hahn.Volume Kinetics for Infusion Fluids[J].Anesthesiology.2010(2)

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部