期刊文献+

重庆大学生现在与将来时间自我比较研究 被引量:3

Self-Time Comparison Between at Present and in the Future of College Students in Chongqing
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较大学生对现在自我和将来自我的评价,探讨大学生现在与将来时间自我比较的特征及影响因素。方法使用《大学生自我概念自评量表》对重庆市5所大学457名学生进行问卷调查,回收有效问卷457份。结果大学生对现在自我的评价高于同龄人;对将来自我的评价显著高于对现在自我的评价;时间自我与评价维度交互作用显著[F(8,449)=7.85,P<0.01];时间自我与时间距离交互作用显著[F(1,455)=4.89,P<0.05];对重要品质的评价高于对不重要品质的评价[F(1,455)=148.78,P<0.01]。结论大学生对自己的评价高于同龄人,对将来自我的评价高于现在自我,时间距离和品质的重要性对个体的自我评价有影响。 Objective To explore character and influencing factors of self temporal comparison between at present and in the future among college students by comparing their self-evaluation of present and future.Methods By using self-evaluation dimension questionnaire on self-concept of university students,457 college students from 5 universities in Chongqing were surveyed and 457 valid questionnaires were received.Results The college students considered that they were better than peers,and the evaluation for self in the future was better than present.The interaction of self temporal and appraisal dimensionality was significant[F(8,449)=7.85,P〈0.01].The interaction of self temporal and time distance was significant[F(1,455)=4.89,P〈0.05].The evaluation on important traits was higher than on unimportant traits[F(1,455)=148.78,P〈0.01].Conclusion College students evaluate themselves better than peers and consider that they will be better in the future than present.Time distance and the importance of trait can influence self appraisal.
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第11期1001-1002,共2页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 西南大学国家重点学科资助项目(编号:西国重04024)
关键词 自我概念 时间 对比研究 学生 Self concept Time Comparative study Students
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1孙炯雯,郑全全.在社会比较和时间比较中的自我认识[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(2):240-245. 被引量:23
  • 2ALBERT S. Temporal comparison theory. Psychol Rev, 1977,84 (6) :485 -503.
  • 3WILSON AE, ROSS M. From chump to champ: Peopleg appraisals of their earlier and present selves. J Person Soc Psychol, 2001,80(4) : 572 - 584.
  • 4隆莉,赵玉芳.自我时间比较的初步研究[J].医学教育探索,2006,5(6):566-568. 被引量:3
  • 5GILBERT DT, FISKE ST, LINDZEY G, et al. The handbook of social psychology. Boston : McGraw-Hill, 1998:680 - 740.
  • 6谢晓非,谢冬梅,张怡玲,等,译.社会心理学.10版.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:125-128.

二级参考文献19

  • 1刘萃侠.马洛—克罗恩社会赞许性量表对中国被试适用性之初步验证[J].社会学研究,2001(2):49-57. 被引量:27
  • 2[4]Brown J D, Gallagher F M. Coming to terms with failure: private self-enhancement and public self-effacement. Journal of Experimental social Psychology, 1992, 28: 3~22
  • 3[5]Brown J D, Collins R, Schmidt G. Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55: 445~453
  • 4[6]Albert S. Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 1977, 84: 485~503
  • 5[7]Suls J, Marco C A, Tobin S. The role of temporal comparison, social comparison, and direct appraisal in the elderly's self-evaluations of health. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1991, 21: 1125~1144
  • 6[8]Wilson A E, Ross M. From chump to champ: people's appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80: 572~584
  • 7[9]Fleeson W, Heckhaunse J. More or less "me" in past, present, and future: Perceived lifetime personality during adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 1997, 12: 125~136
  • 8[10]Stapel D A, Koomen W. I, we, and the effects of others on me: how self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80: 766~781
  • 9[11]Mussweiler T, Strack F. The "relative self": Informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79: 23~38
  • 10[12]Gibbons F X. Social comparison as a mediator of response shift. Social Science & Medicine, 1999, 48: 1517~1530

共引文献23

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部