期刊文献+

一种个体软件过程能力度量方法(英文) 被引量:1

Personal Software Process Capability Assessment Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个体软件过程(PSP)是由卡内基?梅隆大学软件工程研究所的 Humphrey 领导开发的.它是一种可用于控制、管理和改进个人工作方式的自我持续改进过程.随着工业界对软件过程改进需求的日益增长,PSP 成为了软件组织为达成完全(从宏观到微观)量化过程管理研究中的一个热点课题.软件过程研究表明,高水平的个体软件过程能力是软件项目成功的关键,如何进行有效的个体软件过程能力度量是 PSP 中的一个核心问题.现有方法不能同时有效处理个体软件过程能力度量中的可变规模收益、多变量输入/输出以及决策者偏好问题.提出了一种综合了数据包络分析(DEA)和层次分析法(AHP)的个体软件过程能力评价方法——PSPADA,介绍了 PSPADA 的个体软件过程能力评价模型和核心算法(集成决策者偏好和估计规模收益).实验结果显示,PSPADA 能够在考虑决策者偏好的同时,有效地进行多指标、规模收益可变的量化评估. Personal Software Process (PSP) was introduced by Watts Humphrey in CMU/SEI. It is a measured software process aiming at individual software engineers. With the increasing industrial demand for software process improvement, PSP has become a hot topic for software organizations to achieve the goal of total (from macro to micro) quantitative process management. Since higher process capability is recognized as a determinant of better project performance, it is a critical step to assess the personal software process. However, the assessment of PSP capability exhibits Variable Return to Scale (VRS), Multi-Input-Multi-Output (MIMO) and Decision-Making preference problems, which makes existing traditional assessment methods ineffective. In this paper, a novel Personal Software Process Assessment method by synthesizing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)—PSPADA is proposed. PSPADA’s hybrid model and fundamental assessment algorithms (incorporating decision-making preferences and estimating return to scale) are introduced. Experimental results show that the proposed PSPADA model would be particularly helpful in assessing the capability of personal software processes under the MIMO and VRS constraint, by incorporating Decision-Making preferences.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期3137-3149,共13页 Journal of Software
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos.90718042, 60873072 the National High-Tech Research and Development Plan of China under Grant Nos.2007AA010303, 2007AA01A127 the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No.2007CB310802~~
关键词 个体软件过程(PSP) 数据包络分析(DEA) 层次分析法(AHP) 可变规模收益(VRS) 多变量输入/输出(MIMO) personal software process (PSP) data envelopment analysis (DEA) analytic hierarchy process (AHP) variable return to scale (VRS) multi-input-multi-output (MIMO)
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1CMMI Product Team. Capability maturity model integration, Version 1.1. CMU/SEI-2002-TR-003, ESC-TR-2002-003, Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001.
  • 2Humphrey W. PSP(sm): A Self-Improvement Process for Software Engineers (SEI Series in Software Engineering). Addison- Wesley Professional, 2005.
  • 3Bohem B. Software Engineering: Barry W. Boehm's Lifetime Contributions to Software Development, Management, and Research. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007.
  • 4Stensrud E, Myrtveit I. Identifying high performance ERP projects. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 2003,29(5):387-416.
  • 5Zhang S, Wang YJ, Yang Y, Xiao JC. Capability assessment of individual software development processes using software repositories and DEA. In: Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Software Process (ICSP 2008). Leipzig: Springer-Verlag, 2008. 147-159.
  • 6Zhang S, Wang YJ, Tong J, Zhou JH, Ruan L. Evaluation of project quality: A DEA-based approach. In: Proc. of the Int'l Software Process Workshop and Int'l Workshop on Software Process Simulation and Modeling (SPW/ProSim 2006). Beijing: Springer-Verlag, 2006.88-96.
  • 7Myrtveit I, Stensrud E. Benchmarking COTS projects using data envelopment analysis. In: William A, James B, et al., eds. Proc. of the 6th Int'l Software Metrics Symp. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 1999. 269-278.
  • 8Farris JA, Groesbeck RL, Aken EMV, Letens G. Evaluating the relative performance of engineering design projects: A case study using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management, 2006,53(3):471-482.
  • 9Florac WA, Carleton AD. Measuring the Software Process: Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1999.
  • 10Charnes A, Cooper WW, Seiford LM. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application. 5th ed., Springer-Verlag, 1994.

同被引文献9

  • 1ISO.Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals-Part 11:Guidance on usability[EQ/OL].[2009-08-12].http:∥www.iso.org/iso/catalogu_detail.htm?csnumber=16883.
  • 2Schmeidler D.Integral representation without additivity[J].Amer Math Soc,1986,97(2):255-261.
  • 3Liou T S,Wang M J.Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1995,50(2):249-255.
  • 4Pinelle D,Gutwin C.Evaluating teamwork support in tabletop groupware applications using collaboration usability analysis[J].Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,2008,12(3):237-254.
  • 5Kirakowski J,Corbett M.SUMI:the software usability measurement inventory[J].B J Ed Technology,1997,24(3):210-214.
  • 6Ardito C.Usability of e-learning tools[EQ/OL].[2009-09-06].http:∥tesi.fabio.web.cs.uniboit/twiki/pub/tesi/documentiRitenutiutili/p80-ardito.pdf.
  • 7Modave F,Eklund P.A measurement theory perspective for MCDM[EQ/OL].[2009-09-22].http:∥www.cs.utep.edu/fmodaveolfin.pdf.
  • 8Dubois D,Grabisch M,Modave F,et al.Relating decision under uncertainty and multicriteria decision making models[J].J Inteu Syst,2000,15(10):967-979.
  • 9连钢,程媛媛,吴根秀.一致完备决策系统中属性重要性定义的改进[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(3):326-329. 被引量:4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部