期刊文献+

基于改进冲突度量的证据组合新规则 被引量:4

New rule of evidence combination based on improved conflict measure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对DS组合规则对证据之间冲突度量估计比较"保守"的问题,提出了一种新的证据组合规则。新组合规则充分考虑了证据之间所有可能的冲突,从而使得在组合过程中不一致的信息被抑制,而一致的信息则被放大。与DS组合规则相比,根据新组合规则得到的合成证据收敛性更好,因此更有利于下一步的识别判决。数值实验验证了新组合规则的有效性。 To solve the problem that the DS combination rule gives a conservative estimate to the conflict measure between evidences, a new evidence combination rule is proposed. All the potential conflicts are fully considered in the new cormbination rule, which ensures that the inconsistent information is suppressed and the consistent information is magnified. The combined evidence gotten with the new combination rule has a better convergence characteristic than that gotten with the DS combination rule, which is helpful to the subsequent decision for target identification. Simulation experiments verify the effectiveness of the new combination rule.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期2637-2640,2727,共5页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 "十一五"国防预研基金(513060302)资助课题
关键词 冲突度量 组合规则 合成证据 收敛性 conflict measure combination rule combined evidence convergence
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hall D L, McMullen S A H. Mathematical techniques in multisensor data fusion[M]. London:Artech House Press, 2004.
  • 2Sharer G. A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 3Murphy C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000,29(1) : 1 - 9.
  • 4Deng Y, Shi W, Zhu Z, et al. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004,38 (3) :498 -493.
  • 5Chen L, Shi W, Deng Y, et al. A new fusion approach based on distance of evidences[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2005, 6(5):476-482.
  • 6张兵,卢焕章.多传感器自动目标识别中的冲突证据组合方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(6):857-860. 被引量:19
  • 7Jousselme A L, Grenier D, Bosse E. A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J] . Information Fusion, 2001, 2(2) :91 - 101.
  • 8Srnets P, Kennes R. The transferable belial model[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1994, 66(2) :191 - 234.
  • 9Smets P. Data fusion in the transferable belief model[C] // Proc. of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion, 2000,1 : PS21 - PS33.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Yager R R.On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41(2):93-138.
  • 2Lefevre E,Colot O,Vannoorenberghe P.Belief function combination and conflict management[J].Information Fusion,2002,3:149-162.
  • 3Haenni R.Comments on about the belief function combination and the conflict management problem[J].Information Fusion,2002,3:237-239.
  • 4Lefevre E,Colot O,Vannoorenberghe P.Reply to the comments of R.Haenni on the paper "belief functions combination and conflict management"[J].Information Fusion,2003,4:63-65.
  • 5Jousselme A L,Grenier D,Bosse E.A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J].Information Fusion,2001,2:91-101.
  • 6Murphy Catherine K.Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J].Decision Support Systems,2000,29:1-9.
  • 7向阳,史习智.证据理论合成规则的一点修正[J].上海交通大学学报,1999,33(3):357-360. 被引量:63
  • 8孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:442
  • 9张山鹰,潘泉,张洪才.一种新的证据推理组合规则[J].控制与决策,2000,15(5):540-544. 被引量:74
  • 10李弼程,王波,魏俊,钱曾波,黄玉琪.一种有效的证据理论合成公式[J].数据采集与处理,2002,17(1):33-36. 被引量:203

共引文献18

同被引文献39

  • 1邢清华,雷英杰,刘付显.一种按比例分配冲突度的证据推理组合规则[J].控制与决策,2004,19(12):1387-1390. 被引量:42
  • 2张晓东,傅建平,张培林.基于BP神经网络的火炮反后坐装置故障诊断[J].兵工自动化,2006,25(8):15-16. 被引量:4
  • 3邢清华.多传感器信息智能融合方法研究[D].西安:空军工程大学,2007.
  • 4Zadeh L A. Review of shafer's mathematical theory of evi- dence[J]. AI Magazine, 1984, 5(3) :81 -83.
  • 5Smets P, Kennes R. The transferable belief model[ J ]. Ar- tificial Intelligence, 1994,66(2) : 191 - 234.
  • 6Murphy C K. Combining of belief functions when evidence conflicts [ J ]. Decision Support Systemss, 2000,29 ( 1 ) : 1 - 9.
  • 7Smarandache F, Dezert J. Proportional conflict redistribution for information fusion [ C ]// Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion ( Collected Works Vol. II ). Rehoboth:American Research Press, 2006.
  • 8Dambreville F. Modeling evidence fusion rules by means of referee functions[ C]//12th International Conference on In- formation Fusion. Seattle, USA :IEEE Press, 2009.
  • 9Martin A, Osswald C. A new generalization of the propor- tional conflict redistribution rule stable in terms of decision [ C]//Smarandache F, Dezert J( Eds. ). Advances and Ap- plications of DSmT for Information Fusion ( Collected Works Vol. II ). Rehoboth:American Research Press, 2006.
  • 10Dezert J. Foundations for a new theory of plausible and para- doxical reasoning [ J ]. Information and Security Journal, 2002,12( 1 ) :26 -30.

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部