期刊文献+

基于DEA的决策单元排序方法研究 被引量:12

Methods of ranking decision making units based on DEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对DEA方法中交叉评价模型在决策单元的评价排序问题上存在的不足——实现完全排序需要进行多次交叉评价,分析了引入差额指标模型的排序机制,该模型得出的评价排序结果较为完整。在此基础上,提出了新的DEA排序模型——综合输入效率模型,给出了具体的评价步骤,可实现与差额指标模型同样的排序功能。进一步通过数值分析对三种不同评价排序模型的排序效果进行对比分析,结论为差额指标与综合输入效率模型在评价排序时更为有效。 In view of the insufficiency of cross evaluation model of DEA methods on the ranking of decision making units that multiple evaluation processes are needed for completely ranking, a ranking mechanism with the balance index model is analyzed, and concluded that the ranking result is more complete with this model having been used. Based on these a new DEA ranking model, the comprehensive input efficiency model, is put for- ward, and the specific evaluation procedures are given, which can achieve the same ranking function as the balance index model. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of three models is carried out through numerical analysis, and the conclusion is that the balance index model and the comprehensive input efficiency model are more efficient and reasonable.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期2648-2651,共4页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
关键词 多属性决策 排序 数据包络分析方法 交叉评价机制 差额指标 综合输入效率 multi-attribute decision making ranking DEA method cross evaluation mechanism balance index comprehensive input efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987.42-57.
  • 2Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Tone K. Data envelopment analysisa comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher , 2000.
  • 3彭育威,吴守宪,徐小湛.利用MATLAB进行DEA交叉评价分析[J].西南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2004,30(5):553-556. 被引量:83
  • 4Adler N, Friedman L, Sinuany Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J], European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140(2) :249-265.
  • 5朱泰英,孙波,陈兆均.基于数据包络分析的工程建设项目评标方法[J].公路交通技术,2004,20(2):101-102. 被引量:9
  • 6任玉珑,粟增德.综合DEA模型在合理低价评标法中的应用研究[J].科技管理研究,2007,27(1):219-222. 被引量:5
  • 7吴杰,石琴.基于DEA方法的多指标评价[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(10):1541-1543. 被引量:21
  • 8Jahanshahloo G R, Junior H V, Lotfi F H, et al. A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 181(1) :331 - 337.
  • 9Alirezaee M R, Afsharian M. A complete ranking of DMUs using restrictions in DEA models[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007, 189(2) : 1550 - 1559.
  • 10Peter B, Kurt N. DEA based yardstick competition in natural resource management[M]. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2003 : 103 - 126.

二级参考文献31

  • 1徐峰.层次分析法在合理低价评标中的应用[J].江苏建筑,2004(B12):50-51. 被引量:1
  • 2杨鸥,侯渡舟.国际工程承包中合理低价中标的博弈分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,37(2):259-261. 被引量:7
  • 3J R Doyle, R H Green. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses[J]. J Opl Res. Soc., 1994, 45(5): 567-578.
  • 4J R Doyle, R H Green. Dada envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making[J]. Omega, 1993, 21(6): 713-715.
  • 5J Sarkis. A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool[J]. Eur. J Opl Res., 2000, 123: 547-557.
  • 6魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988..
  • 7顾基发.评价方法综述[M]//科学决策与系统工程.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1990.
  • 8Charnes A,Cooper W W,Rhodes E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1978,2(6):429-444.
  • 9Chames A,Cooper W W,Lewin A Y,et al.Data envelopment analysis:theory,methodology,and applications[M].Boston:Kluwer,1994.
  • 10Doyle J,Green R.Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making[J].OMEGA,1993,21(6):713-715.

共引文献147

同被引文献135

引证文献12

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部