犯罪构成理论结构比较论略

A Comparative Study on the Doctrines of Constitution of Crime

在大体相当的法律结构基础上,因文化的差异,德日、英美和中俄三个不同法系的犯罪构成理论结构显著不同。三者的外在形态、逻辑结构和文化特点差异颇大,但其基本功能大体相当,各有其道理。我国的犯罪构成四要件理论经过长期的理论建构与实践检验,具有相对的合理性。我国不宜全盘移植德日三阶层要件模式或英美双层次要件模式。进一步理顺和完善犯罪构成四要件模式的内在理论结构,是我国当前相关理论争议的合理出路。推进我国刑事法治,有必要注重刑法机制之刑事一体化理论知识形态。

While legal structures are essentially alike, different cultures have cultivated disparate doctrines of constitution of crime in German-Japanese, Anglo-American and Sino-Russian legal systems. The appearances, logical structures and cnhural features of the doctrines of the three legal systems vary sharply, but generally they have similar basic functions and are respectively justified. The hoary doctrine of four elements of constitution of crime in China＇ s criminal law has been verified of relative rationality both in logic and in prac- tice, which shall not be supplanted with overall transplantation of the three-tier paradigm of German-Japanese or the double-tier paradigm of Anglo-American theory. Further clarifying and improving the internal structure of the four-element doctrine is an appropriate way to settle relevant theoretical disputes. To foster the value of rule of law in criminal justice, it is necessary for China to ensure that a holistic mechanism of criminal justice theories to be maintained.