期刊文献+

风险规制与专家理性——评布雷耶的《粉碎邪恶循环:面向有效率的风险规制》 被引量:6

Risk Regulation and Expert's Rationality——Comment on Breyer's Breaking the Vicious Circle:Toward Effective Risk Regulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 布雷耶在《粉碎邪恶循环:面向有效率的风险规制》一书中分析了美国政府在规制那些不起眼的风险过程中所呈现的风险规制议程确定的随意性、规制缺乏连续性等情形。他认为产生这些问题的症结可以归因于一个邪恶循环,即公众对风险的认知、国会的反应以及规制过程的不确定。为打破这一邪恶循环,则需要建立一种以目标为导向的,去政治化的、精英式的"超级专家理性"制度。就我国风险规制而言,由于存在着与美国政府相似的问题,而布雷耶法官所提出的"超级专家理性"制度切中了我国风险规制体系的要害,因此,这项制度对于破解我国风险规制所存在的问题具有重要的启示意义。 In his Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation, Breyer observes the less-concerned maladies suffered by the uncoordinated US regulators, such as random agenda selection and inconsistency of regulation, ctc, which, in his opinion, are all imputed to the vicious circle, i.e. the public perceptions, Congressional actions and reactions and the uncertainty of regulation. In order to break out from the vicious circle, a super-expert rationality institution should be constituted that is mission-oriented, elitist and de- politicized. As to the risk regulation in China, since the maladies suffered here are similar to those in the USA and the super-expert rationality institution put forth by Breyer is quite to the point of the risk regulation in China, obviously this institution is of significant referential meaning for China to solve her problems in risk regulation.
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期168-177,共10页 Modern Law Science
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"行政应急权力的要素及其制约机制研究"(08CFX015)
关键词 风险规制 专家理性 超级机构 邪恶循环 risk regulation expert rationality super-organization vicious circle
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Stephen Breyer, Breaking the Vicious Circle: To- ward Effective Risk Regulation , Harvard Press, 1993. P11 - 19.
  • 2Leo Levenson, Unnecessary Risks, Graduate School of public Policy, University of California, Berkeley,1989.4- 5.
  • 3Sheldon Meyers, Applications of De Minimis, in De Minimis Risk 102 ( Chris Whipple, ed. , 1987 ).
  • 4United States v. Ottati&Goss, Inc. ,900F. 2d429 ( 1 st Cir. 1990).
  • 5United States v. Ottati&Goss, Inc. ,900F. 2d429 ( 1st Cir. 1990), at440 - 444.
  • 6U. S. Gerneral Accounting Office, Toxic Substance : EPA' s Chemical Testing Program Has Made Little Progress , Government Printing Office, 1990.24 - 25.
  • 7Richard Stone, Zeroing in on Brain Toxins,255 Science1063 ( Feb. 28,1992).
  • 8Michael Gough, How Much Cnacer Can EPARegu- late Away.9 10Risk Analysis1,5 (1990).
  • 9RichardB. Belzer, The Peril and Promise of Risk As- sessment, 14 (4) Regulation40,47 - 48 ( Fall1991 ).
  • 10RichardB. Belzer, The Peril and Promise of Risk Assessment, 14 ( 4 ) Regulation40,40,48 ( Fall1991 ).

同被引文献141

引证文献6

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部