摘要
根据对现代契约法基本矛盾的不同立场,契约法正当性理论分为道义论和目的论两脉。这两种理论都不能合理论证被普遍认同的契约法基本制度。其根本原因在于,两者的理论根基都是单一主体:前者是单一的抽象化原子论的主体,后者以单一的情境化交互性主体为基础。以具有双重属性的主体——罗尔斯理论中的道德主体——作为基点,可以推导出衡量契约制度正当与否的两个契约法正义原则,这些正义原则能够给契约法基本制度提供充分的正当性论证。
According to different viewpoints on the basic contradictions of modern contract law, theories relating to the justification for contract law can be divided into two lines： the deontology view and the teleology view. Neither of them can expound rationally the basic contract institutions universally accepted, because theoretically, both of them are based on a subject of single attribute . The former is based on the unencumbered self, and the latter based on the intersubjective self. The author has deduced two principles of justice for contract law from the moral subject established in Rawls＇ theory of double attributes to determine whether a contract institution is proper or not. These principles can provide the basic institution of the modern contact law with adequate justifications.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期5-14,共10页
Global Law Review
