期刊文献+

不确定条件下煤化工技术经济评价方法 被引量:7

Techno-economic assessment method under uncertainty in coal chemical industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 发展煤化工对保障我国能源安全、充分利用煤炭资源有重大的意义。但我国煤化工行业发展存在较大的不确定性。这种不确定性不仅体现在原料、市场的迅速变化和工程技术的发展趋势,也体现在环境政策和应对气候变化的约束性要求。本文介绍了不确定条件下的投资决策理论(real optionsan alysis,简称为ROA)的基本原理、不确定因素分析方法、建模和求解及其应用于能源利用技术投资领域的研究进展。在此基础上,结合我国煤化工产业发展背景,分析了该理论方法应用于我国煤化工领域相关投资决策和行业发展政策研究的必要性、可行性和应用前景。 To develop coal chemical industry would enable taking full advantage of China's coal resource, and has great significance for national energy security. However, huge uncertainty is faced by coal chemical industry, which is not only reflected by deepening market-oriented reform but also by constraint from policies regarding environmental and climate issues. This paper introduces the application of real options analysis (ROA) into techno-economic appraisal of energy utilization technologies, involving analysis of uncertain factors, modeling and solving techniques. Based on review of current research status, in combination with development background for China's coal chemical industry, the necessity and feasibility of application of the ROA theory is analyzed, indicating that the ROA theory has much potential for application.
出处 《化工进展》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期2087-2091,共5页 Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress
基金 国家自然科学基金(20876087) 教育部博士点专项科研基金(200800030049)资助项目
关键词 投资决策理论 不确定性 煤化工 技术经济评价 real options analysis uncertainty coal chemical industry techno-economic assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Williams R, Larson E. A comparison of direct and indirect liquefaction technologies for making fluid fuels from coal[J]. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2003, 7: 103-129.
  • 2Larson E, Ren T J. Synthetic fuel production by indirect coal liquefaction[J]. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2003, 7: 103-129, 79-102.
  • 3Vliet O, Faaij A, Turkenburg W. Fischer-Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: A carbon, energy flow and cost analysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50: 855-876.
  • 4Dixit A, Pindyck R. Investment Under Uncertainty[M]. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 5Myers S C. Determinants of corporate borrowing[J]. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 1977, 5: 147-175.
  • 6Copeland T, Antikarov V. Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide[M]. London: Texere, 2008.
  • 7Fuss S, Szolgayova J, Obersteiner M, et al. Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty[J]. Applied Energy, 2008, 85:708-721.
  • 8William B, Richard B, Derek B, et al. Investment risks under uncertain climate change policy[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 5766-5773.
  • 9Ming Y, William B, Richard B, et al. Evaluating the power investment optionsnext term with uncertainty in climate policy[J]. EnergyEconomics, 2008, 30: 1933-1950.
  • 10Laurikka H. Option value of gasification technology within an emissions trading scheme[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34: 3916-3928.

共引文献9

同被引文献112

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部