期刊文献+

传统政治结构中的儒家知识分子 被引量:3

The Role of Confucian Scholar-bureaucrats in Traditional Political Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "道义担当精神"这一共同特质使西方近代以来的知识分子和儒家士大夫可以联系起来考察。道尊于势,道统高于政统。士志于道,儒家知识分子代表人民,不断批判、抗议现实的政治权威,缓和了君主与人民的对立和冲突,对传统政治结构起到了稳定作用,形成中国的开明专制。秦汉以来的中国历史,表现为这两种政治主体的协调和冲突的循环。 By analyzing the meaning of "undertaking of Dao and justice", we can compare the class of modern Western intellectuals with that of Confucian scholar bureaucrats. Dao is superior to the tendency, Confucian succession is therefore superior to political tradition. Devoting to Dao, Confucian scholar bureaucrats are able to constantly criticize and protest the actual authority of politics on behalf of ordinary people. Their criticizing and protesting indeed contribute to the formation of ancient China's enlightened despotism in the sense that their efforts alleviate the conflicts between people and emperor and stabilize the traditional political structure. Chinese history, since Qin Han dynasty, has appeared a circle of conflicts and coordination between these two political subjects.
作者 谢远笋
出处 《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期703-708,共6页 Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
关键词 儒家知识分子 道义担当 抗议精神 开明专制 Confucian scholar undertaking of Dao and justice the spirit of protesting enlightened despotism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[美]余英时.《士与中围文化》,上海:上海人民出版社2003年版.
  • 2徐复观.《学术与政治之间》,台北:学生书局,1985年,第57、59、277、59-60页.
  • 3胡秋原.《古代中国文化与知识分子》,台北:学术出版社1988年五版.
  • 4《十三经注疏》.北京:中华书局影印,1980.
  • 5黄鞏.曲礼为人臣之礼不显谏与檀弓事君有犯而无隐讲义[J].船山学报,1934(4):33-35. 被引量:1

共引文献25

同被引文献49

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部