“案结事了”理想的实践障碍及其超越——基于调解案件进入执行程序的实证分析

Overcoming the Obstacles of Ideal Judicial Disputes Settlement——An Empirical Analysis Based on Mediation Cases that Enter the Civil Execution Procedure

尽管调解结案相对于判决结案的优越性重新得到肯定,但调解结案的"案结事了"司法功能却出现弱化趋势,相当部分调解案件"案结事不了"需要法院强制执行。探究原因,从调解程序参与者的角度看,主要是由义务人的不当参与调解与法官不适当地寻求"案结"利益而罔顾"事了"目标造成的。为此,应从杜绝义务人不当参与调解和防止法官不当主持调解两个层面,对诉讼调解相关制度作一重构。

While the superiority of the mediation cases to the judicative cases is affirmed,the mediation cases’ judicial functions have tended to be weakening.The causes for this are mainly the litigant’s improper participating in the mediation and the judge’s ignoring the target of dispute settlement.Therefore,improving the related mediation system to eliminate the above-mentioned obstacles is necessary.