期刊文献+

论中国保险市场监管中的诺斯悖论 被引量:2

The North Paradox of Insurance Regulation in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 保险市场监管中的诺斯悖论是指政府本应从公共利益出发,提供公正公平的监管政策,但由于自身利益问题,政府干预行为会出现失灵,导致监管效率下降,损害保单所有人的利益。中国保险市场发展多年,保险监管同样存在诺斯悖论,主要体现为政府监管政策供给不足和供给过剩并存,这源于特殊的中国保险制度、产权背景和保监会定位,可通过政府监管目标、主体、手段和内容的积极调整,尽量修正政府失灵,以化解诺斯悖论。 In insurance regulation, government is expected to serve the public rather than the regulator itself. Yet the fact is to the opposite. Pursuit of self-interest results in the ineffectiveness of government regulation, which hampers the efficiency and threatens the interest of policyholders. This is so-called North Paradox. There are supply insufficiency and also supply surplus in government regulation that derives from China's particular insurance system, property fight and positioning of insurance regulatory commission. We can modify inefficiency of government regulation and resolve the North Paradox by properly and proactively adjusting regulation target, organization and measures
作者 袁成 刘晓楠
出处 《上海金融》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期47-50,共4页 Shanghai Finance
关键词 诺斯悖论 保险监管 North Paradox Insurance Regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Alan Gart. Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: the Future of the Banking, Insurance, and Securities Industries[M]. John Wiley&Sons, 1994.
  • 2哈罗德·斯凯博.国际风险与保险:环境-管理分析[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1999.
  • 3诺斯.1995年3月9日在北京的演讲[N].经济学消息报.1995-04-08.
  • 4史忠良,郭旭红.入世过渡期结束后中国保险监管制度的完善[J].江西财经大学学报,2007(1):24-27. 被引量:5
  • 5Alan Gart. Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: the Future of the Banking, Insurance, and Securities Industries[M] .John Wiley&Sons, 1994.

二级参考文献2

共引文献5

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部