摘要
Jackson对知识论证的表征主义回应策略,认为表征主义能满足回应知识论证所要求的约束问题。但是由于Jackson没有阐明如何对表征特征(感觉)进行物理主义说明,导致其表征主义论证对学习命题的否定,其对玛丽走出房间之后状态的正面说明缺乏牢靠的论证基础,故尔达不到辩护物理主义的目的。
Frank Jackson's newly reply to the Knowledge Argument(KA) argued that representationalism could meet the constraint problem required by the KA.However,because Jackson didn't explain how to give a physical description to his representional characteristics(feel),his denial to the learning proposition and his positive demonstration of the state after Mary out of the house lacked a solid argument foundation,and finally leaded to fail the purpose of defending physicalism.Besides,Jackson's last approval of ability hypothesis was also very confusing.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期1-6,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature