期刊文献+

虚寒证量表的信度和效度分析 被引量:7

Analysis on Reliability and Validity of Deficiency-cold Questionnaire
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价虚寒证量表的信度和效度,以提高中医量表制定水平。方法:根据中医虚寒证临床辨证症状学的调查资料,通过对1000例受试者的测量,筛选40项条目,编制成中医虚寒证量表。采用奇偶分半法,测量分半信度;计算Cronbach'sα系数测量内部信度;以Kappa和ICC判断评判者信度;通过相关分析及t检验测量判别效度;通过因子分析判别结构效度。结果:量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.8942,各项的Cronbach'sα系数均大于0.65;分半信度在0.83以上;Kappa值为0.7330;ICC为0.73;因子分析显示量表结构效度好。结论:中医虚寒证量表具有较好的信度和效度。 Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of deficiency-cold questionnaire, for improving the level of making scale of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).Methods: According to the investigations of deficieney cold syndrome, 1000 patients were tested, then 40 items were chosen to make the defieieney-eold questionnaire. Odd-even bisecting method was used to test the split-half reliability, Cronbach' s α quotiety was used to test interobserver reliability, Kappa and ICC were used to estimate the reliability of judge. Validity was analyzed by t-test and some others statistical method. At the same time, eonstruct validity was estimated by factor analysis. Results: We found Cronbaeh' s a quotiety is 0.8942, all of them are more than 0.65, the split-half reliability is more than 0. 83, Kappa is 0.7330, ICC is 0.73, and construct validity is good that is verified by factor analysis. Conclusion: Deficiency-cold questionnaire has good reliability and validity.
作者 陆明 王米渠
出处 《辽宁中医药大学学报》 CAS 2009年第12期53-55,共3页 Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 中医虚寒证量表 信度 效度 deficiency-cold questionnaire reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1李凌江,张亚林,杨德森,郝伟,肖水源,李振国,廖巨福,吴舸,罗友根,黄俊,张斌,刘解宁.社区人群生活质量研究──Ⅱ方法学及社区人群的总体生活质量[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(4):186-190. 被引量:219
  • 2卢文岱.SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1996..
  • 3Seymour DG, Ball AE, Russell EM, et al. Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment[J]. J Eval Clin Praet, 2001,7(4):411.
  • 4Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, et al. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey [J].Clin Rehabil, 2001, 15(3):311.
  • 5Daring Y, Andren E, Nordholm L, et al. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure [J].Clin Rehabil, 2001, 15(3):301.
  • 6Cohen ME,Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2000. 81(12 Suppl 2):S21.
  • 7Donaghy S.Wass PJ.Interrater reliability of the functional assessment measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program [J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1998,79:1231-1236
  • 8Bates BE,Stineman MG.Outcome indicators for stroke,application of an algorithm treatment across the continuum of postacute rehabilitation services[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2000,81:1468-1478
  • 9方积乾.医学统计学与电脑试验[M].上海科学技术出版社,2001(第二版).P238-246.
  • 10Cox DR, Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher AE, et al.Quality-of-life assessment: can we keep it simple?[J].J R Statist Soc.A.1992( 155): 353.

共引文献445

同被引文献131

引证文献7

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部