1Pinker S. How the Mind Works. NewYork, NY: WW Norton & Co. , 1997.
2Krebs D L, Denton K. Toward a More Pragmatic Approach to Morality: a Critical Evaluation of Kohlberg's Model. Psychological Review , 2005, 112(3): 629-649.
3Damasio A R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, NY:G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1994.
4Greene J D, Sommerville R B, Nystrom L E, et al. An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 2001, 293: 2105~2108.
5Haidt J. The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: a Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 2001, 108: 814~834.
6Shweder R A, Mahapatra M, Miller J G. Culture and Moral Development, Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 130~204.
7Haidt J. The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology. Science, 2007, 316: 998~1002.
8Kurzban R, Tooby J, Cosmides L. Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98 (26): 15387~15392.
9Rozin P, Haidt J, MeCauley C, et al. Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-peneil versus Behavioral Measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 1999, 33(3):330~351.
10Haidt J, Bjorklund F. Social Intuitionists Reason, as a Normal Part of Conversation. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Iversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.
