期刊文献+

年龄对膀胱癌根治术的影响及预后分析 被引量:11

The influence of age factor upon the patients with radical cystectomy and prognosis analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:影响膀胱癌根治术预后的因素有许多,其中年龄是否是一项重要的预后指标,高龄患者是否应选择膀胱癌根治术,目前国内外尚存在争论。本文旨在研究年龄因素对于这行膀胱癌根治术患者的影响,进而探讨对高龄患者行根治术的意义。方法:回顾性分析行膀胱癌根治术后获得完整随访的121例患者的资料,对年龄与患者临床病理相关预后因素进行统计学分析。结果:行膀胱癌根治术高龄组患者(≥70岁)围手术期死亡的风险较其他年龄组(≤50岁或50~69岁)高,但术后早期并发症无明显差异。肌层浸润性尿路上皮癌患者随着年龄的升高,肿瘤特异性生存率(cancer specific survival,CSS)降低;非肌层浸润性尿路上皮癌患者,高龄组和其他年龄组的CSS无明显差异。多因素分析和相关性分析显示,年龄与肿瘤分期、病理分级、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移和是否伴有淋巴血管侵犯均相关(P<0.05)。结论:高龄患者行膀胱癌根治术是安全的,在提高生存率的同时,并没有增加术后早期并发症。年龄是膀胱癌根治术患者重要的预后因素,但并不对患者预后起决定作用。起决定作用的是与年龄相关的肿瘤病理分期、分级及其它预后不良因素。 Background and purpose: There are many prognostic factors on survival for the patients with radical cystectomy, whether age is an important factor or not, or should the elderly accept the operation are still in controversy. In this article we investigated the influence of age factor upon the patients with radical cystectomy, further to evaluate the usefulness of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of 121 patients with bladder cancer treated by radical cystectomy, analyzed the effects of age and other clinical or pathological characteristics for prognosis of the patients. Results: After radical cystectomy, the perioperative mortality of the elder group ( ≥ 70 years) is higher than those of the younger group ( ≤ 50 years or between 50 to 69 years), but there was no difference in terms of early postoperative complications among these groups. With the increase of age, the cancer specific survival of the patients with invasive bladder cancer was decreased, while for the patients with noninvasive bladder cancer, there was no difference. Multivariate and correlation analyses were performed and showed that there was close correlation between age and tumor stage, grade, size, lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion. Conclusion: The treatment for the elder patients with bladder cancer by radical cystectomy is safe, the surgery could improve the survival rate of patients without increasing the postoperative complications. Age is an important prognostic factor but is not the most important. Tumor stage, grade and other poor prognosis factors play decisive roles.
出处 《中国癌症杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期851-855,共5页 China Oncology
关键词 年龄 膀胱癌 全膀胱切除术 预后 age bladder cancer radical cystectomy prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Vitaly M, Yair L, Francesco M, et al. Predicting survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer [ J J . BJU Int, 2008, 102(1): 15-22.
  • 2Thomas DM, Riddle PR. Morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive radical cystectomies [ J ] . Br J Urol, 1982, 54(6): 716-719.
  • 3Tachibana M, Mural M, Deguchi N, et al. One-stage total cystectomy and ileal loop diversion in patients over eighty years' old with bladder carcinoma [ J ]. Urology, 1983, 22(5): 512-516.
  • 4Clark PE, Stein JP, Groshen SG, et al. Radical cystectomy in the elderly: Comparison of survival between younger and older patients [J]. Cancer, 2005, 103(3): 546-552.
  • 5Rosario DJ, Becker M, Anderson JB. The changing pattern of mortality and morbidity from radical cystectomy [ J ] . BJU Int, 2000, 85(4): 427-430.
  • 6Figueroa A, Stein JP, Dickinson M, et al. Radical cystectomy for elderly patients with bladder carcinoma: an updated experience with 404 patients. [ J ] . Cancer, 1998, 83(1): 141-147.
  • 7Lipponen PK, Eskelinen M J, Kiviranta J, et al. Prognosis of transitional cell bladder cancer: a multivariate prognostic score for improved prediction [ J ] . J Urol, 1991, 146(6): 1535- 1540.
  • 8Yamanaka K, Miyake H, Hara I, et al. Significance of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 80 years old [J].Int Urol Nephrol, 2007, 39(1): 209-214.
  • 9Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1 054 patients [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(3): 666-675.
  • 10Shariat SF, Karakiewiez PI, Palapattu GS, et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium [ J ] . J Urol, 2006, 176(6): 2414-2422.

同被引文献86

  • 1曲华伟,金讯波.女性膀胱癌的特点[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2012,4(4):27-30. 被引量:1
  • 2邵常霞,项永兵,刘振伟,高静,孙璐,方茹蓉,阮志贤,高立峰,金凡,高玉堂.上海市区泌尿系统恶性肿瘤相对生存率分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(6):321-324. 被引量:30
  • 3余绍龙,周芳坚,秦自科,韩辉,刘卓炜,王斌,王欢,李永红.217例膀胱移行细胞癌外科治疗的临床分析[J].癌症,2006,25(1):73-75. 被引量:7
  • 4Cheatham ML,Chapman WC,Key SP,et al. A meta-analysis of se- lective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective la- parotomy[ J ]. Ann Surg, 1995,221 ( 5 ) : 469-476.
  • 5Vermeulen H,Storm-Versloot MN, Busch OR, et al. Nasogastric in- tubation after abdominal surgery : a meta-analysis of recent literature [J ]. Arch Surg, 2006,141 (3) : 307-314.
  • 6Freeman JA,Tarter TA,Esrig D,et al.Urethral recurrence with or- thotopic ideal neobladder [J]. J Urol, 1996, 156(5 ) : 1615-1619.
  • 7Hautmann RE. Urinary diversion:ileal conduit to neobladder [J]. J Urol, 2003,169 (3) : 834-842.
  • 8Steers WD. Voiding dysfunction in the orthotopic ileal neobladder [ J l.World J Urol, 2000, 18 ( 5 ) : 330-337.
  • 9Sevin G,Soyupek S,Armagan A,et al. Ileal orthotopic neobladder ( modified Hautman )via a shorta detubularized ileal segment : expe- rience and results [ J ]. BJU Int, 2004,94( 3 ) : 355-359.
  • 10Hummouda HM. Functional evuation of modified T pouch as ileal neobladder orthotopic reservoir[ J ].J Egypt Natl Cane lnst, 2004, 16 ( 1 ) :29-33.

引证文献11

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部