组织结构、创新与企业绩效:环境的调节作用被引量：30

Organizational Structure,Innovations and Firm Performance:Moderating Effects of Environment

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于397家中国企业的问卷调查所得数据,检验了探索式创新、利用式创新的前因和后果,发现:正规化的组织结构对两类创新均有促进作用,集权化的组织结构对利用式创新有负面影响;两类创新对企业绩效均有提升作用;环境竞争性对探索式创新与绩效的关系起正向调节作用,而对利用式创新与绩效的关系起负向调节作用。 Using the data gathered through a survey of 397 Chinese enterprises, the antecedents and effects of exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation are tested empirically. The restflts show that formalization has positive effect on the two types of innovations, and centralization has negative effect on exploitative innovation. Both exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation are proved have positive effect on firm performance. Environmental competitiveness is found positively moderate the effectiveness of exploratory innovation, but negatively moderate the effectiveness of exploitative innovation.

作者李忆司有和

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期20-26,共7页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

关键词探索式创新利用式创新组织结构环境企业绩效 exploratory innovation exploitative innovation organizational structure environment firm performance

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators [ J ]. Management Sciance,2006,52(11) : 1661 - 1674.
2He Z, Wong P. Exploration and exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis [ J ]. Organization Science, 2004,15 (4) : 481 - 494.
3孙永风,李垣,廖貅武.基于不同战略导向的创新选择与控制方式研究[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(4):24-30. 被引量：60
4孙永风,李垣.转型经济下中国企业创新选择的实证研究:环境与组织因素[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(1):41-46. 被引量：22
5Benner MJ, Tushman ML. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2003,28 : 238 - 256.
6Cardinal LB. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development[J]. Organization Science ,2001,12( 1 ) : 19 - 36.
7Sheremata WA. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2000,25 : 389 - 408.
8Atuahene-Gima K. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? [ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003,46 ( 3 ) : 359 - 374.
9Daft RL,Lengel RH. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design [ J ]. Management Science, 1986, 32 : 554 - 571.
10Zollo MM, Winter SG. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities [ J ]. Organization Science, 2002,13 : 339 - 351.

二级参考文献53

1Downs,G.W.and L.B.Mohr.Conceptual issues in the study of innovation[J].Administrative Science Quarterly.,1976,21:700～714.
2Knight,K.E.A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process[J].Journal of Business,1967,40:478 ～ 496.
3Hull,F.M.,Hage,J.,& Azumi,K.R&D management strategies:American versus Japan[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,1985,32:78～ 83.
4Hitt,MA.,R.E.Hoskisson and R.A.Johnson and D.D.Moesel.The market for corporate control and firm innovation[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39:1084 ～ 1119.
5Jensen,M.C.The modern industrial revolution,exit,and the failure of internal control systems[J].Journal of Finance,1993,48:831 ～ 880.
6Tornatzky,Louis G.and Mitchel Fleischer.The process of technological innovation[M].Lexington,MA:Lexington Books,1990.
7Ackoff,R.L.Creating the corporate future[M].1981,Wiley,New York.
8Van de Ven,A.,& Poole,M.Explaining development and change in organizations[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):510 ～ 540.
9DeCanio,Stephen J.,Dibble,Catherine,Amir-Atefi,Keyvan.The importance of organizational structure for the adoption of innovations[J].Management Science,2000,46(10):1285 ～ 1299.
10Hauptman,O.and Hirji,K.K.(1999).Managing integration and co-ordination in cross-functional teams[J].R&D Management,29(2),179～ 191.