1Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Analysis of composite type (Artglass) and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance. J Dent, 2000; 28 (5) : 355-9.
3Jason Parrya, Edward Harringtona, Gareth D, et al. Control of brushing variables for the in vitro assessment of toothpaste abrasivity using a novel laboratory model. J Dent Volume, 2008 ;36 (2) :117 -24.
4M Ghazal, B Yang,K Ludwig,el al. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater, 2008 ;24:502-7.
5Nagarajan S, Jahanmir S,Thompson P. In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent Mater, 2004;20( 1 ) :63 -71.
6Reich S. M, Petscheh A, Wichmann M, et al. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. J Bio Mater Res Part A, 2004;69(1) :65 -9.
7Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res, 1997 ;38:303 - 13.
8S. D. Heintze, A. Cavalleri, M. Forjanic, et al. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. Dent Mater, 2006 ;22 : 1051 - 62.
10Kohyama K, Hatakeyama E, Sasaki T, et al. Effects of sample hardness on human chewing force : a model study using silicone rubber. Arch Oral Biol, 2004 ;49:805 - 16.
4GHAZAL M, YANG B, I.UDWIG K, et al. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel [J]. Dent Mater, 2008,24 : 502-507.
5REITH S M, PETSCHELT A, WICHMANN M, et al. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices [J]. Bio Mater Res Part A , 2004,69A(1):65-69.
