期刊文献+

对交通事故认定书证据属性的质疑 被引量:16

Objection the Evidence Character of Traffic Accident Report
原文传递
导出
摘要 按照目前的立法,交通管理部门处理交通事故应出具交通事故认定书。依据现行法律,学者们认为交通事故认定书具有证据属性。存在的问题是难以对交通事故认定书进行证据归类,而按证据形式合法性要求,法定证据种类之外的材料不是证据;同时,除鉴定结论以外的其他证据均产生于案件的发生、发展过程中,交通事故认定书不符合这一本质要求。根据处理交通事故的法律规定,可以看出交通事故认定书产生于具体行政行为的过程中,并作为具体行政行为之结果生成的依据。 According to the legislation,the traffic police should make with the traffic accident report.The academicians thought that the traffic accident report is a kind of evidence,and has character of evidence.The existing problem is we have difficult to decide which kind evidence is it,and the legality of the evidence s form is an important matter to decide the competency of the evidence.In the other,almost all kinds of evidence except appraisal conclusion was born in the course of the case.The traffic report fall short of this requirment. In fact, the tragic determination is produced in the course of the specific administrative conduct,and it provides a bisis to the result of the specific administratice conduct. So it should be a arranged administrative conduct.
作者 赵信会
出处 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期116-120,共5页 Legal Forum
基金 中国博士后基金会课题<民事证据评价研究>(20090451299)的阶段性成果
关键词 交通事故认定书 证据 准备性行政行为 the traffic accident report evidence the arranged administrative conduct
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

共引文献188

同被引文献162

引证文献16

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部