期刊文献+

作为语言知识的语法规则系统 被引量:2

Syntactic Rules as Knowledge of Language
原文传递
导出
摘要 乔姆斯基认为:具有语言能力就是心智处于某种状态。更准确地说,是天赋的语言机能在接触到后天的经验语料之后通过设定参数所达致的稳定状态,这个稳定状态内部表征了一个句法规则系统,它们是说话者"知道"的语言知识。此论文首先将致力于阐明,认为语言知识是一个句法规则系统,乔姆斯基的这一论点存在哪些困难;其次,文章还将论证这一主张——乔姆斯基意义上的句法规则系统不是说话者知道的全部语言知识,也不可能充分刻画说话者具有的语言能力。 From Chomskys perspective of view: To know a language is for one's language processing to employ an internally represented gener- ative grammar of the language. The set of syntactic rules, represented in the steady state of the language faculty of a competent speaker, is the speaker's knowledge of language. Speaker's knowledge of language is a set of syntactic rules, this is the very claim I will examine in this paper. First, this paper clarifies some difficulties which Chomsky's claim have to deal with; then, I will argue for this point, a set of syntactic rules can "t be an adequate description of speaker's linguistic competence.
作者 刘小涛
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期40-45,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 语言能力 语言知识 句法规则 乔姆斯基 linguistic competence knowledge of language syntactic rules Chomsky
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Devitt M, Sterelny K. Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
  • 2乔姆斯基.乔姆斯基语言哲学文选[M],徐烈炯等译.商务印书馆,1992.
  • 3刘小涛.乔姆斯基的“学习理论论证”与模块性假设[J].哲学研究,2008(10):110-116. 被引量:3
  • 4Chomsky N. Knowledge of Language: Its Elements and Origins [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 2002: 295, 223-234.
  • 5Chomsky N. Rules and Representations [M]. Columbia University Press, 1980.
  • 6Chomsky N. Knowledge of Language.. Its Nature, Origin, and Use [M]. 外语教学与研究出版社,2002.
  • 7Searle J R. The Philosophy of language [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.
  • 8Pylyshyn Z W. Rules and Representations: Chomsky and Representational Realism [J], Draft of A Talk Presented at the Conference on "The Chomskian Turn", Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, 1988(4) : 11- 14.
  • 9Churchland P. On the Nature of Theories: A Neurocompurational Perspective [J]. Reprinted in J Haugeland (ed.). Mind Design Ⅱ: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press/Bradford Books, 1997 : 251 - 292.
  • 10Chomsky N. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

二级参考文献16

  • 1乔姆斯基.1992年.《乔姆斯基语言哲学文选》,徐烈炯等译,商务印书馆.
  • 2乔姆斯基.2006年.《乔姆斯基语言学文集》,宁春岩等译,湖南教育出版社.
  • 3塞尔.2006年.《心、脑与科学》,杨音莱译,上海译文出版社.
  • 4桑代克.1998年.《人类的学习》,李月甫译,浙江教育出版社.
  • 5Anderson, S. & Lightfoot, D. , 2002, The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Chalmers, D. , 1990, Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong: the simplest refutation, in Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
  • 7Chomsky, N. , 1976, Reflections on Language, Mauriee Temple Smith Ltd..
  • 8Chomsky, N. ,1980, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press.
  • 9Chomsky, N. ,1981, Knowledge of language : its elements and origins, in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, volume 295, number 1077/October 02 : pp. 223 - 234.
  • 10Chomsky, N. ,1985(2002), Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, 外语教学与研究出版社.

共引文献2

同被引文献53

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部