期刊文献+

投资成本和市场需求不对称的房地产投资决策期权博弈模型

An Asymmetric Duopoly Option Game Model of Real Estate Investment Decision under Investment Cost and Market Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 引入投资成本和市场需求变量,建立了房地产不对称双头期权博弈模型。并进行均衡策略分析,得出当两开发商的投资成本和市场需求之比差异不显著时,存在序贯、抢先和同时投资均衡;当两开发商的投资成本和市场需求之比差异显著时,存在序贯和同时投资均衡;当两开发商的投资成本和市场需求之比相等时,存在抢先和同时投资均衡。市场需求与项目价值成正比,与投资阈值成反比,投资成本对项目价值影响较小,与投资阈值成正比例变化。 Investment cost and market demand are introduced to set up an asymmetric duopoly option game model of real estate investment decision. Then three equilibriums such as preemptive, sequential and simultaneous equilibrium are discussed, and the results indicate that investment cost and market demand have an important impact on developer's investment strategies. To every developer, whether or not to be leader and when to invest depend on its comparative advantage and disadvantage between investment cost and market demand. When the comparative advantage is not significant, three equilibriums such as preemptive, sequential and simultaneous equilibrium exist; when the comparative advantage is significant, two equilibriums such as sequential and simultaneous equilibrium ex- ist; When the comparative advantage is equal, two equilibriums such as preemptive and simultaneous equilibrium exist. The investment strategy analysis showed that compared with investment cost, market demand has a greater impact on the investment value, at the same time, the two factors have a great influence on the investment threshold.
作者 赵旭
出处 《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第5期33-37,共5页 Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)
基金 湖南省社科基金项目"期权博弈视角下的房地产投资决策理论与应用研究"资助(编号:07YBB285)
关键词 房地产 投资决策 期权博弈 投资成本 市场需求 real estate investment decision making option game investment cost market demand
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Williams J T. Equihbrium and Options on RealAssets [ J ]. The Review of Financial Studies, 1993 (4) : 825 - 850.
  • 2Grenadier S. Strategic exercise of options develoment case - cades and overbuilding in real estate market [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1996.
  • 3Huisman K JM, KortPM. Effects of strategic interactions on the option value ofwaiting[ R ]. WorkingPaper, Tilburg University,1999(6) : 121 - 160.
  • 4Wang, Ko and Yuqing Zhou. Equilibrium real options exercise strategies with muhiple players: the case of real estate markets[ J ]. Real Estate Economics, 2006 ( 1 ) : 1 - 49.
  • 5洪开荣,蒋苏健.有限经济寿命视角下房地产投资决策的期权博弈分析[J].延安大学学报(社会科学版),2008,30(3):58-62. 被引量:2
  • 6王军武,彭俊.基于期权博弈的房地产项目投资决策研究[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2008,25(2):15-18. 被引量:4

二级参考文献15

  • 1于春梅,于清珍.实际选择权在战略性投资决策中的运用[J].农业与技术,2004,24(6):152-153. 被引量:2
  • 2孟力,孙威,汪定伟.不确定条件下双头垄断期权博弈[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2006,15(1):20-25. 被引量:7
  • 3[1]Smets F R.Essay on foreign direct investment doctoral dissertation[R].Yale Uiversity,1993.
  • 4[2]Williams J T.Equilibrium and Options on Real Assets[J].The Review of Financial Studies,1993,6(4):825-850.
  • 5[3]Grenadier S.Strategic exercise of options develoment casecades and overbuilding in real estate market[J].Journal of Finance,1996.
  • 6[4]Perotti E,Kulatilaka N.Time-to-market Capability as a Stackelberg Growth Option[R].Working paper,University of Amsterdam,1999.
  • 7[5]Huisman K J M,Kort P M.Effects of strategic interactions on the option value of waiting[R].Working Paper,Tilburg University,1999(6):121-160.
  • 8[8]Gryglewicz s,Huisman K,Kort P M.Finite Project Life and Uncertainty Effect on Investment[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control,2007.
  • 9[9]谢识予.经济博弈论(第二版)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社.2005.
  • 10Huisman K J M.Technology Investment.A Game Theoretic Real Option Approach[M].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2001.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部