期刊文献+

弥散加权神经成像术诊断臂丛神经病变 被引量:15

Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance neurography in brachial plexus neuropathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨弥散加权神经成像术(DW-MRN)对臂丛神经病变诊断的准确性及定量诊断价值。方法对52例受检者行常规MR序列及重T2脂肪抑制(T2WI/SPIR)和DW-MRN。其中20例臂丛神经病变患者按病理类型分为损伤组、炎症组和肿瘤组。结果与T2WI/SPIR比较,DW-MRN臂丛C7神经节的对比噪声比和病灶对比噪声比均较高(t=2.19、3.91,P均<0.05),对臂丛神经病变诊断的灵敏度亦较高(χ2=4.44,P<0.05)。臂丛神经病变的ADC值高于正常神经节和中干(t=4.80、5.69,P均<0.05);损伤组和肿瘤组的ADC值高于炎症组(F=6.99、5.28,P均<0.05)。结论DW-MRN对臂丛神经及其病变有良好的显示能力,ADC值可作为臂丛神经病变的定量诊断的参考指标。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy and quantitative diagnostic value of diffusion weighted MR neurography(DW-MRN)in brachial plexus neuropathy.Methods Twenty patients with brachial plexus diseases and 32 controls underwent cervix MR scan included heavy-T2WI with fat-suppress(T2WI/SPIR)and DW-MRN.The patients were divided into 3 groups,i.e.injury group,inflammation group and tumor group.Results Contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR)of C7 and the lesions with DW-MRN were higher than those with T2WI/SPIR(t=2.19,3.91,both P0.05).The diagnostic sensitivity of DW-MRN in brachial plexus neuropathy was higher than that of T2WI/SPIR(χ 2=4.44,P〈0.05).The ADC value of brachial plexus focus was higher than that of normal ganglion and middle trunk(t=4.80,5.69,both P〈0.05).The ADC value of injury group and tumor group was higher than that of inflammation group(F=6.99,5.28,both P〈0.05).Conclusion DW-MRN has great value in detecting brachial plexus neuropathy,and the ADC value can be used as index of quantitative diagnosis.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期2092-2095,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 臂丛神经 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 磁共振神经成像术 Brachial plexus Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging Magnetic resonance neurography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Aagaard BD, Maravilia KR, Kliot M. Magnetic resonance neurography: magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerves. Neuroim agingClin N Am, 2001,11(1):131-146.
  • 2Cudlip SA, Howe FA, Griffiths JR, et al. Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve following experimental crush injury, and correlation with function deficit. J Neurosurg, 2002, 96 (4) :755-759.
  • 3李新春,陈健宇,刘庆余,沈君,梁碧玲.正常臂丛节后神经MR神经成像术[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(1):105-107. 被引量:36
  • 4高立,梁碧玲,张赟,钟镜联,叶瑞心.兔坐骨神经背景信号抑制扩散加权成像[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(10):1530-1533. 被引量:3
  • 5Takeharu Y, Naoto H, Shinichi Y, et al. Brachial plexus injury: clinical manifestations, conventional imaging findings, and the latest imaging techniques. Radiographics, 2006,26(Suppl 1):S133-143.
  • 6Stanisz GJ, Midha R, Munro CA, et al. MR properties of rat sei atic nerve following trauma. Magn Reson Med, 2001,45(3):415- 420.
  • 7Manenti G, Squillaci E, Di Roma M, et al. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging. Radiol Med, 2006,111 (8):1124-1133.
  • 8Koh DM, Scuur E, Collins D, et al. Predicting response of color ectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007,188(4):1001-1008.
  • 9Girometti R, Furlan A, Bazzocchi M, et al. Diffusion weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients. Radio Med, 2007,112(3) :394-408.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Aagaard BD, Maravilia KR, Kliot M. Magnetic resonance neurography: magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerves. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2001,11(1):131- 146.
  • 2Cudlip SA, Howe FA, Griffiths JR, et al. Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve following experimental crush injury, and correlation with functional deficit. J Neurosurg, 2002, 96 (4) :755-759.
  • 3Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, et al. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) : technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiation Medicine, 2004,22(4):275- 282.
  • 4Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, et aI. Feasibility of high resolution diffusion-weighted MR neurography for spinal nerves. Mag Reson Med, 2004:11.
  • 5Maravilla KR, Bowen BC. Imaging of the peripheral nervous system: evaluation of peripheral neuropathy and plexopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1998,19(6) :1011-1023.
  • 6Ross JS. Newer sequences for spinal MR imaging: smorgasbord or succotash of acronyms? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1999, 20 (3): 361-373.
  • 7Chrysikopoulos H, Pappas J, Papanikolaou N, et al. Bone marrow lesions: evaluation with fat-suppression turbo spin echo MR imaging at 0.5T. Eur Radiol, 1996,6(5) :895-899.
  • 8Niitsu M, .Tohno E, Itai Y. Fat suppression strategies in enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of SPIR and water excitation sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2003,18(3) :310 -314.
  • 9Clark CA, Hedehus M, Mosely ME. In vivo mapping of the fast and slow diffusion tensors in human brain. Magn Reson Med, 2002,47(4) : 623-628.
  • 10Arndt WF, Truax AL, Barnett FM, et al. MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation anci fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images. AJR Am J Neuroradiol, 1996, 166 (1) : 119-124.

共引文献36

同被引文献167

引证文献15

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部