传承与超越:主观恶性说新诠解

Inheritance and Surpass:On Subjective Malign Theory

主观恶性说有着悠久历史,在其历史嬗变过程中主要形成了义务侵害说、规范违反说及道德危害说等具体学说。主观恶性说的合理之处在于指出行为人主观上对法律的否定态度,而其疵瑕之处则是只强调对法律的遵守而轻忽法律的合理内涵,易造成恶法亦法,从而导致立法者暴政,故为维护公民基本人权,重构主观恶性说可谓势在必行。

Subjective malign theory has long history and it mainly connotes the theory of obligation infringement, the theory of norm violation and the theory of moral harms. It is properly point out the actor＇ s negative attitude to law, but it is inadequate to only demand abiding the law and neglect the reasonable connation of law, which easily leads to the possibility of ＂ evil law is law＂ and the tyranny of legislators. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct tbe theory of subjective malign so as to protect basic civil right.