期刊文献+

同种异体半腱肌腱双束重建前交叉韧带的近期临床疗效 被引量:8

PRIMARY CLINICAL RESULTS OF DOUBLE-BUNDLE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH SEMITENDINOSUS ALLOGRAFTS
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用同种异体半腱肌腱双束重建前交叉韧带的近期临床疗效。方法回顾分析2006年3月-10月应用同种异体半腱肌腱双束重建前交叉韧带33例中,获完整随访临床资料31例。男24例,女7例;年龄18~35岁,平均25岁。左膝18例,右膝13例。运动伤23例,车祸伤8例。所有患者均经MRI及关节镜检查证实为单纯前交叉韧带完全断裂,不伴侧副韧带及后交叉韧带损伤。受伤至手术时间为1~43个月,平均11个月。术后将膝关节固定于0°位2周,并逐步进行膝关节功能康复锻炼。结果2例分别于术后4d和7d出现切口渗液,对症处理后切口愈合;其余患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。无膝关节僵硬、血管及神经损伤、膝关节感染等并发症发生。术后31例均获随访,随访时间为24~29个月,平均26个月。术后2年复查MRI示移植物连续性良好,信号接近正常前交叉韧带。术前及末次随访时双侧膝关节前向松弛度差异测量、Lachman试验及轴移试验结果比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前及末次随访时双下肢周径差分别为(11.6±7.9)mm及(5.0±3.1)mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前Tegner评分、Lysholm评分及国际膝关节评分委员会评分分别为(3.83±1.15)、(64.38±6.81)、(41.42±6.30)分,末次随访时评分分别为(6.29±0.64)、(94.45±3.03)、(95.72±3.10)分,手术前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论同种异体半腱肌腱是一种良好移植物,双束重建前交叉韧带术后近期临床疗效满意。 Objective To evaluate the primary clinical results of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with semitendinosus allografts. Methods From March 2006 to October 2006,33 patients underwent double-bundle ACLR with semitendinosus allografts. The complete followed-up data of 31 patients was analyzed retrospectively. There were 24 males and 7 females aged 18-35 years old (average 25 years old). The injury was caused by sports accidents in 23 cases and traffic accidents in 8 cases,involving the left knee in 18 cases and the right knee in 13 cases. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture were confirmed by MRI and arthroscopy in all the patients,without lateral collateral ligaments injuries and posterior cruciate ligament injuries. The time from injury to operation was 1-43 months (average 11 months). The knee was fixed at 0° position after operation for 2 weeks and got knee joint rehabilitation exercises gradually. Results The incision of 2 patients showed effusion 4 and 7 days after operation,respectively,and healed after symptomatic treatment. The incision of 29 patients healed by first intention. There were no complications such as stiffness of knee joint,neurovascular injuries and joint infections. All the patients were followed up for 24-29 months (average 26 months). MRI displayed the anterior cruciate ligament grafts presented with good connection and signal similar to the normal 2 years after operation. There was significant difference between the preoperational value and the final follow-up value in terms of bilateral knee joint difference of prior laxity,Lachman test,and pivot shift test (P 〈 0.05 ). The circumference difference between the injured and the normal was (11.6 ± 7.9) mm before operation and (5.0 ± 3.1) mm at the final follow-up (P 〈 0.05). The Tegner score,Lysholm score,and International Knee Documentation Committee score was 3.83 ± 1.15,64.38 ± 6.81,and 41.42 ± 6.30,respectively,before operation,and 6.29 ± 0.64,94.45 ± 3.03,and 95.72 ± 3.10,respectively,at the final follow-up. There was a significant difference between before and after operation (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The primary clinical results of double-bundle ACLR with semitendinosus allografts are satisfactory and the allogeneic semitendinosus are good grafts for double-bundle ACLR.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期1451-1455,共5页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 前交叉韧带 同种异体半腱肌腱 双束重建 关节镜 Anterior cruciate ligament Allogeneic semitendinosus Double-bundle reconstruction Arthroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Krych AJ, Jachson JD, Hoskin TL, et al. A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autografl versus pateUar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(3): 292-298.
  • 2Roberts T, Drez D, McCarthy W, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized, bone patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med, 1991, 19(1): 35-41.
  • 3Bach BR Jr, Aadalen KJ, Dennis MG, et al. Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med, 2005, 33(2): 284-292.
  • 4Zhao ], Peng X, He Y, et al. Two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with eight-stranded hamstring tendons: four-tunnel technique. Knee, 2006, 13(1): 36-41.
  • 5Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985, (198): 43-49.
  • 6Lysholm l, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med, 1982, 10(3): 150-154.
  • 7Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validationof the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med, 2001, 29(5): 600-613.
  • 8Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta analysis comparing patel- lar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med, 2003, 31(1):2-11.
  • 9Goradia VK, Grana WA. A comparison of outcomes at 2 to 6 years after acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy, 2001, 17(4): 383-392.
  • 10Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21 (7): 791-803.

二级参考文献24

  • 1徐志宏,蒋青,陈东阳,李文,孙旭.关节镜下同种异体髌腱组织重建膝前交叉韧带的初步临床研究[J].江苏医药,2004,30(8):570-572. 被引量:5
  • 2李卫平,黄建荣,刘尚礼,林道贤,沈慧勇,李春海,宋卫东,韩运,王志勇,马文谱.膝关节镜下同种异体髌骨-髌腱-胫骨移植物重建交叉韧带41例[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(5):341-344. 被引量:16
  • 3Fetto JF, Marshall JL. The natural history and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1980, (147): 29-38.
  • 4Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, et al. Biomeehanical analysis of hu man ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1984, 66: 344-352.
  • 5Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Meal, 2001, 29: 600-613.
  • 6Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med, 1982, 10: 150-154.
  • 7Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985, (198): 43-49.
  • 8Victor J, Bellemans J, Witvrouw E, et al. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction--prospective analysis of patellar tendon autografts compared with allografts. Int Orthop, 1997, 21: 93-97.
  • 9Siebold R, Buelow JU, Bos L, et al. Primary ACL reconstruction with fresh-frozen patellar versus Achilles tendon allografts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2003, 123: 180-185.
  • 10Gorschewsky O, Klakow A, Riechert K, et al. Clinical comparison of the Tutoplast allograft and autologous patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone) for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: 2- and 6-year results. Am J Sports Med, 2005, 33:1202- 1209.

共引文献18

同被引文献131

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部