期刊文献+

肝硬化疗效评价指标体系研究 被引量:6

Study on the Establishment of the Evaluation Index System of Chinese Medicine Treatment of Hepatitis Cirrhosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:初步建立起中医药治疗肝炎后肝硬化疗效评价指标体系,并在此基础上,探索出一套建立有中医特色的临床疗效评价指标体系的方法。方法:本研究采用Delphi专家咨询法建立指标体系,通过问卷调查的方式,对符合遴选标准的36位来自5个省市的相关专家,分两轮开展专家咨询。运用统计学分析及结合专家意见对指标进行筛选;采用Delphi法和百分权重法计算指标的权重系数。结果:确立包含3个层次共52项中医药治疗肝炎后肝硬化疗效评价指标,其中传统的中医证候指标、传统西医疗效指标、生存质量指标和并发症的发生率4项一级指标的权重系数分别为0.2649、0.2602、0.2354和0.2395。结论:初步建立了肝炎后肝硬化疗效评价指标体系,该体系包括中医证候疗效指标、传统西医疗效指标、生存质量指标和并发症的发生率等4个方面。且在此次研究中专家积极可靠,指标筛选过程比较规范,指标比较全面、可靠,可用于实践进一步检验与完善。 Objective :This study is expected to construct as scientific system of outcome assessment indexes of Cirrhosis of liver after hepatitis, and find a proper way to construct a clinical outcome indicator system with TCM characteristics. Methods : This study used a literature review,expert argument, Delphi expert advice of the establishment of indices. , to meet the selection criteria of 36 from five provinces and cities in the relevant experts, carried out two rounds of expert advice. According to indicators of the importance and feasibility of central tendency and dispersion trend statistics,with expert advice on the selection indicators, Useing the Delphi method of calculating the weight percent of the index weighting factor. Results : An evaluation system that consisted of 3 hierarchies and 52 basic indexes was established in the final. The weight of the first grade indexes, namely symptom of Chinese medicine index,imagelogy index and living quality guidline were 0. 3459,0. 3390and 0. 3151, respectively. Conclusion:The experts were active and professional,and the process of indicator system development was normative. Therefore, the indicator system was comprehensive and reliable to be further tested and improved in the practice.
出处 《辽宁中医杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第12期2017-2019,共3页 Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划资助项目(2006BAI08B02-07)
关键词 肝炎后肝硬化 疗效评价 指标体系 德尔菲法 cirrhosis of liver after hepatitis therapeutic effect assessment Indicator system delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1曾兆,争辉.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994:250-70.
  • 2Brown B. De1 Phi Process:A Methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of expels [ M ]. Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation, 1965.
  • 3游海燕.预测、评价指标体系构建研究现状述评[J].数理医药学杂志,2005,18(3):265-267. 被引量:11
  • 4Jennifer M, Stephen P, Frederick P, et al. Rehabilitation of traumatic injuries: Use of the Del Phi Method to Identify Topics for Evidence - Based Review[ J ]. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabili- tation ,2003,82 (5) :410 - 414.
  • 5Avery B, Rivera, Frederick P. et al. Management of the injured pa-tient:Identification of Research Topics for Systematic Review Using the Delphi Technique[ J]. Journal of Trauma - Injury Infection & Critical Care, 2003,54 ( 3 ) :595 - 601.
  • 6Susan D,Mark A,Thomas F,et al. A pilot survey study to define quality in residency education[ J ]. Acadenric Medicine ,2000,75 ( 1 ) :71 -73.
  • 7王虹,杨兴华,尹娜,梁万年.社区卫生服务模式效果效益评价指标体系拟订分析[J].中国全科医学,2003,6(3):220-222. 被引量:39
  • 8梁万年,王红,杨兴华.中国城市社区卫生服务评价指标体系的建立[J].中国卫生事业管理,2002,18(8):460-462. 被引量:104
  • 9艾尔巴比.社会研究方法[M].李银河编辑,成都:四川人民出版社,1987.
  • 10谢虹,詹思延,孔灵芝.我国社区慢病综合防治示范点组织管理评价指标体系的建立[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2002,22(5):31-34. 被引量:34

二级参考文献47

共引文献350

同被引文献135

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部