摘要
目的探讨α肾上腺素受体亚型拮抗剂和钙通道阻滞剂对门静脉的作用机制及其在肝硬变门脉高压情况下的变化.方法采用药物受体分析技术,结合离体和整体实验,进行肝硬变门脉高压鼠和正常鼠的对照研究.分析测定了:①哌唑秦(prazosine,Pra),育亨宾(yohimbine,Yoh),硝苯吡啶(nifrdipine,Nif)与门静脉α受体的亲和力,②Pra,Yoh,Nif对门静脉收缩效应的影响;Pra和Nif对门静脉压力的影响.结果正常鼠门静脉对Pra的亲和力为Yoh128倍,而PHT鼠二者却相差不显著(P>005),其中对Pra的亲和力下降了5倍,Yoh增加了277倍.对Nif的亲和力正常鼠为PHT鼠的14倍.Pra和Nif使门静脉收缩曲线显著右移,对门静脉收缩效应的抑制率分别为:对照组,Pra712%,Nif899%,PHT组,Pra682%,Nif744%.Pra能显著降低两组鼠的门静脉压力,Nif显著降低正常鼠的门静脉的压力,而PHT鼠仅轻度下降(P>005).结论门静脉突触后α受体亚型是α1,而α1的亚型主要是α1a,Pra和Nif通过阻断α1和α1a受体而抑制门静脉收缩,降低门静脉压力.因此α?
IM Abstract:To investigate the mechanism of prazosin (Pra), yohimbine (Yoh) and nifedipine (Nif) in inhibiting the contraction of portal vein and decreasing the portal venous pressure (PVP).METHODS SD rats were divided into two groups randomly: control group (n=14) and PHT group (n=16, the model of rats with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension were induced by thioacetamide). According to the effect in vivo and in vitro after antagonist treatment, the PA2, NE dose response effects of preparations, antagonist dissociation constant and PVP were evaluated using pharmacological methods.RESULTS The order of suppression of the maximal contraction in control group was Nif (899%)>Pra(712%)>Yoh(245%), and Nif (744%)>Pra(682%)>Yoh(267%) in PHT group. The order of PA2 in control group was Pra>Yoh>Nif and Yoh>Pra>Nif in PHT group. Pra decreased significantly the PVP in two groups (P<005), Nif reduced the PVP in control group (P<001), but it did not in PHT group (P>005).CONCLUSION In rat portal vein, the α adrenoceptor subtypes is α1 and α1a. Pra and Nif antagonize them to inhibit the contraction of portal vein and lower the PVP in PHT group. If the potency of α1 adrenoceptor is reduced, it would affect its value of clinical application.
关键词
肝硬化
哌唑秦
育亨宾
硝苯吡啶
药理学
liver cirrhosis
hypertension, portal
portal vein/drug effects
prazosin/pharmacology
yohimbine/pharmacology
nifedipine/pharmacology
diseases models, animal