期刊文献+

中国对外直接投资与服务贸易关系实证分析 被引量:1

Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and Service Trade
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从实际出发,中国对外直接投资和服务贸易可能存在替代或互补关系。实证分析发现,现阶段,中国对外直接投资和服务贸易的特点决定两者之间的关系是替代的,这不仅表现为中国对外直接投资与中国服务贸易出口是替代关系,而且也表现为中国对外直接投资与中国服务贸易进口是替代关系。这种替代关系是不显著的,这与两者之间规模相差过大直接相关。中国对外直接投资相当部分投资于商务服务,而且与货物贸易的区域分布高度相关,这决定了中国相当部分的对外直接投资是市场导向型。同时,随着中国第三产业竞争力的改善,服务贸易对外直接投资将会增加。中国对外直接投资和服务贸易可能会互补。 From a practical viewpoint, there may be a relationship of sustitute or complement between Chinese FDI and service trade. The empirical analysis finds that at the present stage, the properties of Chinese FDI and service trade determine the substitute relationship. The relationship reflects not only the substitute relationship between Chinese FDI and Service Trade export but also Chinese FDI and Service Trade import. And this relationship is not significant, as it is directly related to the scales of FDI and service trade. Chinese FDI considerably is concentrated on commerce service, and is highly related to the space distribution of commodity trade. So, Chinese FDI is considerably market-oriented. Meanwhile, with the improvement of Chinese third industry, Chinese FDI of service trade will increase. Therefore, Chinese FDI and service trade will complement each other.
作者 何荣 杨立君
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2009年第4期10-13,共4页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
基金 湖北省教育厅社科类课题资助项目(2007d274)
关键词 对外直接投资 服务贸易 实证分析 FDI service trade empirical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1James R Melmin. Trade in Producer Services: A Heckscher-Ohlin Approach[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97(5): 1180- 1196.
  • 2Mundell Robert A. International Trade and Factor Mobility [J].American Economic Review, 1957, 47 : 321-335.
  • 3Markusen James R. Factor Movements and Commodity Trade as complements[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1983, 14:341-356.
  • 4Uekley Peter J, Mark Casson. The Optimal Timing of Foreign Direct Investment[J]. Economic Journal, 1981, 91 : 75-87.
  • 5Markusen James R. Multinationals, Multi-plant Economics, and the Gains from Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1984,16 (3-4) :205-206.
  • 6Lipsey Robert E, Merle Yahr Weiss. Foreign Production and Exports of individual Firms[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1984, 66: 304-307.
  • 7Rugman Alan M. Multinationals and Canada-United States Free Trade[M]. Columbia: Universtiy of South Carolina Press, 1990. 339-421.
  • 8Bralnard S Lael. A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with a Trade-off between Proximity and Concentration [ R ]. Cambridge: NBRE Working Paper No.4269,1993.
  • 9Bralnard S Lael. An Empirical Assessment of the Proxlmity-Concentration Trade-off Between Multinational Sales and Trade[J]. American Economic Review, 1997, 87(4) : 520-544.
  • 10Swenson Deborah L. Explaining Domestic Content: Evidence from Japanese and U.S. Automobile Production in the United States [A].Robert C Feenstra. Effects of U.S. Trade Protection and Promotion Policies [C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. 33-35.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部