期刊文献+

头孢吡肟与头孢他啶随机对照治疗下呼吸道感染的meta分析 被引量:6

A meta-analysis of the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection with randomized control study of Cefepime and Ceftazidime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗下呼吸道感染的有效性和安全性。方法按照系统评价的要求全面检索了中国数字医院图书馆、万方数据库,对符合纳入标准的9篇文献进行meta分析。结果头孢吡肟组的临床有效率、痊愈率和细菌清除率显著高于头孢他啶组,而不良反应比较无统计学差异。结论细菌感染所致的下呼吸道感染,头孢吡肟的临床疗效优于头孢他啶。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cefepime and Ceftazidime in the treatment of of lower respiratory tract infection. METHODS According to the requirements of Cochrane systematic review, a through literature search was performed among Chinese hospital digital library (CHKD) and Wanfang Database.A-meta analysis was performed on patients involved in 9 papers which met the inclusion a. RESULTS Compared with Ceftazidime, Cefepime was more superior on clinical cure rates, clinical effective rates and bacterial eradication rates and had no significant difference on adverse reaction rates. CONCLUSION Cefepime was more effective than Ceftazidime on Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.
作者 梁学政 李茵
出处 《海峡药学》 2009年第11期107-110,共4页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 头孢吡肟 头孢他啶 META分析 下呼吸道感染 Cefepime Ceftazidime Meta-analysis Lower respiratory tract infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献46

  • 1邓国华,王爱霞.新型头孢菌素Cefepime的药理与临床研究[J].中国新药杂志,1993,2(2):7-10. 被引量:8
  • 2周延安.新的第四代头孢菌素头孢吡肟[J].国外医药(抗生素分册),1995,16(5):344-348. 被引量:13
  • 3汪复.β-内酰胺类抗生素临床应用进展[J].中国新药杂志,1996,5(2):81-85. 被引量:22
  • 4程显声.慢性阻塞性肺病的肺部听诊[J].中国实用内科杂志,1997,17(4):239-240. 被引量:2
  • 5[1]Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13:818
  • 6[2]Segreti J, Levin S. Bacteriologic and clinical applications of a new extended-spectrum parenteral cephalosporin. Am J Med, 1996, 100(Suppl 6A):45
  • 7[3]Leophonte P, Bertrand A, Nouvet G, et al. A comparative study of cefepime and ceftazidime in the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. J Antimicro Chemother, 1993, 31(Suppl B):165
  • 8[4]Ambrose PG, Richerson MA, Stanton M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cefepime compared with ceftazidime in intensive care unit patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia. Infectious Disease in Clinical Practice, 1999, 8(5):245
  • 9[5]Paladino JA. Cost-effectiveness comparison of cefepime and ceftazidime using decision analysis. Pharmaco Economics, 1994, 5(6):505
  • 10[3]Steward CD, Rasheed J K, Hubert SK. Characterization of clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from 19 laboratories using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards extendedspectrum beta-lactamase detection methods. J Clin Microbiol.2001 ;39: 2864~2872.

共引文献88

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部