期刊文献+

辩护律师证据知悉权独立化研究——以与控方卷证移送关系为视角 被引量:1

The Study of Defense Attorney's Right of Evidence Acquaintance
原文传递
导出
摘要 无论是英美"起诉状一本主义"还是意大利"法官卷宗"移送制度,都对辩护律师证据知悉权的实现不起决定性作用。在我国司法实践中,辩护律师的证据知悉权因完全依赖于控方卷证移送而受到"主要证据复印件移送主义"的压制。辩护律师证据知悉权只有摆脱控方卷证移送方式的绝对控制,获得自身的独立性,才有可能最大限度地得到实现。 Neither British American exclusiveness of the bill of prosecution or Italian judge's file delivery system plays a decisive role as to the realization of defense attomey's right of evidence acquaintance. In China's judicial practice, the defense attorney'sg right of evidence acquaintance completely depends on the delivery mode of the accuser's files and evidence. The realization of defense attorney's right of evidence acquaintance can be achieved only when defense attorney evade from the complete control of file delivery mode and gain individual independence.
作者 唐治祥
出处 《政法学刊》 2009年第5期71-76,共6页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 辩护律师 证据知悉 依附 独立 卷证移送 defense attorney evidence acquaintance subordination independence file and evidence delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献32

  • 1在京部分教授关于刑事诉讼法实施问题的若干建议[J].政法论坛,1996,14(6):32-41. 被引量:14
  • 2[日]平野龙一.侦查与人权[M].有斐阁,1981.91.
  • 3Delisle & Stuart, Learning Canadian Criminal Procedure, pp612-613, 1991.
  • 4R.V, Stinch combe (1991), 68C. C. C. (3d) 1, 9C. R. (4^th) 277.
  • 5Preston, [1993] 3W. L. R. 918.
  • 6Richaed May, Criminal Evidence (1995 3^rd. ed, Sweet & Maxwell), pp386-387.
  • 7[1965] 1 Q. B. 348-349.
  • 8Richard May, Crimind Evidence (1995 3^rd. ed. Sweet & Maxwell), p384.
  • 9Brady v. MaryLand, 373, U. S. 83, 83S. Ct 1194, 10L. Ed, 2d 215 (1953).
  • 10Berger v. United States, 295 U. S. 78, 5SS. Ct. 829, 79L Ed. 1314 (1935).

共引文献107

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部