摘要
无论是英美"起诉状一本主义"还是意大利"法官卷宗"移送制度,都对辩护律师证据知悉权的实现不起决定性作用。在我国司法实践中,辩护律师的证据知悉权因完全依赖于控方卷证移送而受到"主要证据复印件移送主义"的压制。辩护律师证据知悉权只有摆脱控方卷证移送方式的绝对控制,获得自身的独立性,才有可能最大限度地得到实现。
Neither British American exclusiveness of the bill of prosecution or Italian judge's file delivery system plays a decisive role as to the realization of defense attomey's right of evidence acquaintance. In China's judicial practice, the defense attorney'sg right of evidence acquaintance completely depends on the delivery mode of the accuser's files and evidence. The realization of defense attorney's right of evidence acquaintance can be achieved only when defense attorney evade from the complete control of file delivery mode and gain individual independence.
出处
《政法学刊》
2009年第5期71-76,共6页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
辩护律师
证据知悉
依附
独立
卷证移送
defense attorney
evidence acquaintance
subordination
independence
file and evidence delivery