期刊文献+

动词结构的转喻理据 被引量:3

Metonymic Motivation of Verb Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转喻作为一种基本的认知机制在语法结构的形成中扮演重要角色。动词结构中价的扩展与压缩、名词向动词的转换以及成分扩充等语法现象借助转喻成为语言现实。这类语法现象可以通过基于类属理想化认知模型的相关激活操作得到解释,激活操作的成功进行取决于能否在类属认知模型中建立转喻联系。从认知角度分析动词结构的转喻理据为进一步揭示一般思维和语言能力之间的关系提供了一个很好的窗口。 Metonymy, as a kind of basic cognitive mechanism, plays an important role in grammar. Metonymy is a basis for realization of valency extension and reduction, shift from noun to verb and enriched composition in verb structure. These grammatical phenomena can be explained by activation based generic ICMs. The successful activation depends on successful establishment of metonymy connection in the genetic ICMs. Analyzing the metonymic motivation behind verb structure provides a wonderful window for the further research of the relationship between general thinking and language ability.
作者 刘云飞 雷卿
出处 《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2010年第1期58-62,共5页 Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金 三峡大学青年科学基金项目"从转喻看语法结构和间接言语行为的统一认知方式"(KJ2008A014)的部分成果
关键词 动词结构 激活 类属理想化认知模型 转喻 Verb structure Activation Generic ICM Metonymy
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Klaus-Uwe, Panther, G. Radden. Metonymy in Language and Thought [ M ]. Amsterdam : John Benjamin, 1999.
  • 2Taylor, John. LinguisticCategorization Prototypes in Linguistic Theory[ M]. 3rd Edition. OUP, 2003.
  • 3Croft, W. The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies [ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993 (4): 335-370.
  • 4Radden, G. , Z. Kovecses. Towards a Theory of Metonymy [ A ]. Metonymy in Language and Thought [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin, 1999. 17 - 59.
  • 5Dirven, Rene. Metonymy and Metaphor: Different Mental Strategies of Conceptualization [ A ]. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast[ C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002.75 -112.
  • 6Blank, A. Co-presence and Succession: A Cognitive Typology of Metonymy [ A ]. Metonymy in Language and Thought [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin, 1999. 169 - 191.
  • 7Barcelona, A. Types of Arguments for Metonymic Motivation of Conceptual Metaphor[ A]. Metaphor and Metony- my at the Crossroads[C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.31 -58.
  • 8Radden, G. How Metonymic Are Metaphors? [ A] . Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads [ C ]. Berlin/ New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.31 - 58.
  • 9Gibbs, Raymond. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 10Thomburg, Linda and Panther, Klaus-Uwe. Speech Act Metonymies [ A]. Discourse and Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1997. 205 -219.

二级参考文献57

共引文献127

同被引文献20

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量:728
  • 2李勇忠.语言结构的转喻认知理据[J].外国语,2005,28(6):40-46. 被引量:48
  • 3孙亚.误解与言语行为转喻[J].外语教学,2007,28(2):20-23. 被引量:21
  • 4Langacker, R W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Volume I Theoretical prerequisites[M]. Beijing: University Press, 2004.
  • 5Lakoff, G. & M Turner. More than cool reason, a field guide to poetic metaphor [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
  • 6Langacker, R.W. Reference-point constructions [J]. Cognitive Linguisties, 1993(1): 1-38.
  • 7Radden, G. & Kovecses, Z Towards a theory of metonymy [A]. Panther, K and Radden,G. Metonymy in language and thought[C]. Arnsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin, 1999: 17-59.
  • 8William Croft, D & Alan Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2006.
  • 9Ruiz de Mendoza Iba? ez, E J. & Diez Velasco O. I. High-Level Metonymy and linguistic structure [J]. Atlantis, 2001(1): 297-314.
  • 10Ruiz de Mendoza Iba? ez, J. L. & Oral, Campo.Metonymy, Grammar and Communicntion[M]. Granada, Spain: Editorial Comares, 2002.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部