1[1]Zahn R,Schiele R,Gitt AK,et al. Impact of prehospital delay on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis. Am Heart J,2001,142:105-111
2[2]Ottervanger JP, van't-Hof AW, Reiffer S, et al. Long-time recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J, 2001,22(9 ): 785-790
3[3]Poli A,Fetiveau R,Vandani P,et al. Integrated analysis of myocardial blush and ST-segment elevation recovery after successful primary angioplasty:Real-time garding of microvascular reperfusion and prediction of early ang late recovery of left ventricular function. Circulation, 2002,106 ( 3 ): 313-318
4[4]ACTOR study Group.The late open artery hypothesis at the crossroad.The ACTOR study: aggressive versus conservation treatment of the infarct-related artery after acute MI. G Ital Gardiol,1999,29( 1 ): 1-10
5[5]Fabbiocchi F, Bartorelli AL, Montorsi P, et al. Elective coronary stent implantation in cardiogenic shock comelicating acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and six month clinical and angiographic results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2000,50 (4): 384-389
6[6]Rogers WJ,Canto JG,Lamberw CT,et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999;the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1,2 and 3.J AM Coil, 2000,36: 2056-2063
7[7]Wagner S, Schneider S,Schiele R, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in Germany between 1996 ang 1998: therapy and intrahospital course. Results of the Myocardial Infarction Registry(MIR) in Germany. Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 1999, 88: 857-867
8[9]O'Neilww, The reperfusion war: where will be the next battles be fought. Am J Med,2001,110:65-66
9[10]Magid DJ,Calonge BN, Rum sfeld JS, et al. Relation between hospital primary angioplasty vol ume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs throm bolytic therapy. JAMA,2001,284:3131-3138
