期刊文献+

Braun静脉剥脱器与传统剥脱器治疗大隐静脉曲张的对比研究 被引量:3

A comparative study of Braun venostrip and traditional stripper for treatment of varicose of great saphenous vein
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比研究Braun静脉剥脱器与传统剥脱器治疗大隐静脉曲张的临床效果。方法将40例大隐静脉曲张患者随机分为两组,每组20例,A组采用Braun静脉剥脱器,B组采用传统金属剥脱器。比较两组切口数、一次性剥脱成功率、术后疼痛、手术时间、术后住院时间、并发症等指标。结果A组比B组的切口数、手术时间显著降低,一次性剥脱成功率增高(P<0.05或P<0.01),术后疼痛、术后住院时间、并发症发生率差异无显著性。结论使用Braun静脉剥脱器疗效优于使用传统金属剥脱器。 Objective To comparatively study the efficacy of Braun venostrip and traditional stripper for treatment of varicose of great saphenous vein. Methods 40 patients with great saphenous vein varicosity undergone sur-gical treatment were randomly assigned to Braun venostrip group (group A) and traditional stripper group (group B). The number of surgical incision, one - time successful rate of stripping, post - operative pain, duration of surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and complications of the 2 groups were compared. Results Less surgical incisions and shorter time of surgery but more one - time successful rate of stripping were found in group A,compared to those in group B, there were statistically significant differences ( P ,0.05 or P 〈(0.01). There were no significant differences in comparison of post - operative pain, post - operative hospitalization time and complications. Conclusion The effficacy of surgery for great saphenous vein varicosity with Braun venostrip was better than that with traditional stripper.
出处 《右江民族医学院学报》 2009年第6期950-951,共2页 Journal of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities
关键词 静脉曲张 剥脱器 varicose vein stripper
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

共引文献26

同被引文献24

  • 1马庆久.下肢静脉曲张的治疗现状[J].吉林医药学院学报,2005,26(1):4-6. 被引量:16
  • 2蔡维体,徐升举,胡军.皮下捆扎法治疗大隐静脉曲张65例疗效观察[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2006,14(2):146-146. 被引量:1
  • 3刘小平,郭伟,贾鑫,等.内翻剥脱加点式抽剥治疗下肢静脉曲张(附500例报告)[J].中国血管外科杂志,2010,2(3):166-168.
  • 4Hirai M, Iwata H, Ishibashi H, et al. Interface pressure and stiffness of various elastic stockings during posture changes and ex- ercise[J]. Vascular,2008,16(2):95-100.
  • 5Scheltinga MR, Wijburg ER, Keulers B J, et al. Conventional versus invaginated stripping of the great saphenous vein:a ran- domized, double- blind, controlled clinical trial [J]. World J Surg,2007,31:2236-2242.
  • 6Hirai M,Iwata H,Ishibashi H,et al. Interface pressure and stiffness of various elastic stockings during posture changes and exercise [J].Vascular,2008,16(2):95-100.
  • 7Knipp BS, Blackburn SA, Bloom JR,et al. Endovenous laser ablation:venous outcomes and thrombotic complications are independent of the presence of deep venous insuffi- ciency [J]. J Vasc Surg,2008,48(6) : 1538-1545.
  • 8Scheltinga MR,Wijburg ER,Keulers BJ,et al. Conven- tional versus invaginated stripping of the great saphenous vein : a randomized ,double- blind ,controlled clinical tri- al [J]. World J Surg, 2007,31 : 2236-2242.
  • 9符洋,黄建华,李孝成,刘光强,汤恢焕,吕新生,张祁.不同手术方法治疗大隐静脉曲张的临床对比分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2008,17(6):588-590. 被引量:23
  • 10金辉.微创点状剥脱术在大隐静脉曲张疾病治疗中的应用[J].中国现代医生,2010,48(10):111-112. 被引量:9

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部