期刊文献+

不同耕作措施下双季稻田生态系统碳循环及其生态服务价值 被引量:5

Ecosystem Service Value and Carbon Cycle of Double Cropping Paddy Under Different Tillage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 耕作方式对稻田碳循环有着较大的影响。采用田间试验方法,研究了秸秆还田条件下,不同耕作措施双季稻田碳循环及其生态服务价值,为稻田生态服务价值计算及土壤固碳潜力评价提供依据。试验于湖南省宁乡县进行,通过静态箱法测定翻耕秸秆还田(CT)、旋耕秸秆还田(RT)、免耕秸秆还田(NT)稻田CH4及CO2排放,根据美国橡树岭国家生态实验室得出的碳折算系数计算各项农资投入的碳释放。结果表明:(1)机械操作造成的碳排放为CT>RT>NT,免耕分别比翻耕和旋耕碳减排61.69、35.70kgC.hm-2;(2)含碳农资碳减排对于稻田碳减排具有较大作用,其中减少含碳农资投入对于免耕碳减排作用最大;(3)免耕促进了稻田土壤碳固定,稻田生态系统总体碳固定为NT>CT>RT;(4)采用免耕、减少含碳农资投入有利于固碳及增加稻田生态系统服务价值。本研究得出免耕秸秆还田有利于减少碳排放及增加稻田生态系统生态服务价值,建议长江中下游双季稻区采用以免耕秸秆还田为主的保护性耕作。 Tillage influences carbon cycle of paddy greatly. In order to provide theoretical guide for forecasting carbon sequestration potential of soil and evaluating ecosystem service value, a field trial was conducted during 2005 to 2009 to evaluate the performance of the tillage effect on carbon cycle and ecosystem services value. Both early-rice and late-rice straws were returned. During the winter season, rice fields were left fallow under drained. The closed chamber method was used to measure the CH4 and CO2 emission from the paddy field with the treatments of conventional tillage(CT), rotary tillage (RT), no-tillage (NT) at Ningxiang County, Hunan Province. Carbon emission of all kinds of agri- cultural inputs had been calculated by using carbon convert coefficient which was from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The results showed as following: (1)NT reduced carbon emission by 61.69, 35.70 kg C·hm^-2 compared with CT,RT,respectively, with increasing mechanical strength for NT, RT and CT; ( 2 )The carbon emission reduction of agricultural inputs contributed greatly to carbon reduction, which was the most important carbon reduction aspect for NT; (3)NT was benefit to paddy carbon sequestration; (4)NT and reducing agricultural inputs were benefit to carbon sequestration and increased paddy ecosystem service value. This research got the results that NT attributed to release carbon emission and increase paddy ecosystem service value. So we suggest using NT, which is the main tillage method in conservation tillage, in the double paddy soil area.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期2489-2494,共6页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 国家“十一五”科技支撑计划(2006BAD15B01) 2008年公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200803028)
关键词 耕作 碳循环 稻田 生态服务价值 tillage carbon cycle paddy ecosystem service value
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Bernard S B, Soussana J F. Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change:causes and consequences observed for agriculture and animal production[J]. Courtier de l'environnement de I'INRA, 2008, 55:79-91.
  • 2Furukawa Y, Inubushi K, Ali M, et al. Effect of changing groundwater levels caused by land-use changes on greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peat lands[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2005, 71 ( 1 ) : 81- 91.
  • 3Smith K A, Conen F. Impacts of land management on fluxes of trace greenhouse gases[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2004, 20(Supplement ) : 255-263.
  • 4王明星,李晶,郑循华.稻田甲烷排放及产生、转化、输送机理[J].大气科学,1998,22(4):600-612. 被引量:138
  • 5Bender M, Conrad R. Effect of CH4 concentrations and soil conditions on the induction of CH4 oxidation activity[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1995, 27(12) : 1517-1527.
  • 6Baggs E M, Chebii J, Ndufa J K. A short-term investigation of trace gas emissions following tillage and no-tillage of agroforestry residues in western Kenya[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2006, 90(1-2) :69-76.
  • 7Costanza R, D'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387:253-260.
  • 8欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640. 被引量:1312
  • 9Pattanayak S K. Valuing watershed services.Concepts and empirics from southeast Asia[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004, 104 (1):171-184.
  • 10Turner W R, Brandon K, Brooks T M. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services[J]. Bio Science, 2007, 57(10) : 868-873.

二级参考文献112

共引文献1964

同被引文献133

引证文献5

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部