期刊文献+

论合宪性解释不是宪法的司法适用方式 被引量:26

Constitutional Interpretation Is not Judicial Application Mode of Constitution
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于被认为我国现行宪法体制阻碍了宪法在法院审理具体案件中的适用,有学者主张将合宪性解释作为我国宪法司法适用方式。这种主张存在着严重的理论问题,因为合宪性解释只是一种法律解释方法,宪法在合宪性解释中仅仅是一种帮助确定法律规范含义的辅助工具,在合宪性解释中根本不涉及宪法适用。而且,将合宪性解释误作宪法的司法适用方式,必然给我们探寻正确的宪法司法适用路径带来消极影响。因此,合宪性解释不是宪法的司法适用方式,也难以担当宪法司法适用的大任。 Due to the fact that the application of constitution in the court of particular cases is hampered by China's ongoing constitutional system , some scholars suggest the legal interpretation according to Constitution as the proper method for the constitution of judicial explanation. This claim contains damaging theoretic effects : since the legal interpretation according to Constitution is just a kind of legal interpretation methods, if it is applied in the constitution of judicial explanation, constitution can only be deemed as a tool to determine the legal norms. Such situation shows that the legal interpretation according to Constitution doesn't involve practical constitutional application at all. Meanwhile, mistakenly setting the legal interpretation according to Constitution for the constitution of judicial explanation will definitely cast harmful impacts on the path to finding proper methods for constitution of judicial explanation. So,We can come to the conclusion that the legal interpretation according to Constitution can not and should not be regarded as the applicable way for the constitution of judicial explanation.
作者 谢维雁
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期168-177,共10页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献202

同被引文献344

引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部