期刊文献+

亲社会性行为及其社会偏好的分解 被引量:53

Prosocial Behaviors and the Decomposition of Social Preferences
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过结合一个被试内设计的双人匿名且完全陌生搭配的"四合一"实验和调查问卷,首先论证了四种经典亲社会性行为的广泛存在性,并发现这几种亲社会行为两两之间均显著相关;同时我们对信任博弈实验中的投资和回报行为以及公共品博弈中的投资行为进行了社会偏好的分解和检验,发现信任博弈中的信任投资行为受互惠偏好的显著影响,而可信任回报行为受到纯粹利他偏好和互惠偏好的双重影响;同时公共品博弈实验中的投资行为受到差异厌恶偏好的显著影响。 Employing a within-subjects design, in this paper we run a two-person anonymous and absolutely strange matching quaternate experiments with suvery questions. We found there are widely exsited with four kinds of classic prosocial behaviors and we also detected a significant relations between these different kinds of prosoeial behaviors in different games. Meanwhile we decomposed and tested the social preferences behind the trust and trustworthiness actions in the trust game and the cooperation actions in the public goods game. We found that the variance in trust actions is accounted for by expectation of trustworthiness but not altruism, while variance in trustworthiness actions is mainly accounted for by altruism with a comparatively small role of reciprocity. And the pattern of cooperation behavior in public goods game is consistent with inequality aversion.
作者 陈叶烽
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期131-144,共14页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 亲社会性行为 社会偏好 公共品博弈实验 信任博弈实验 独裁者实验 Prosocial Behavior Social Preferences Experimental Economics Public Goods Game Trust Game Dictator Game
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1陈叶烽.2009:《信任水平的测度及其比较:来自实验的证据》,浙江大学经济学院工作论文.
  • 2陈叶烽,叶航.2008:《基于相关实验的社会偏好理论:一个综述》,浙江大学社会科学跨学科中心工作论文.
  • 3魏光兴.公平偏好的博弈实验及理论模型研究综述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):152-160. 被引量:33
  • 4夏纪军.中国的信任结构及其决定——基于一组实验的分析[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):39-51. 被引量:30
  • 5周业安,宋紫峰.公共品的自愿供给机制:一项实验研究[J].经济研究,2008,43(7):90-104. 被引量:61
  • 6Andreoni, J., 1995, " Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle the Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110( 1 ), pp. 1-21.
  • 7Andreonl, J. and Miller, J., 2002, "Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Ahruism", Econometrica, 70(2), pp. 737 753.
  • 8Ashley, R., Ball, S. and Eckel, C., 2009, "Motives for Giving: A Reanalysis of Two Classic Public Goods Experiments", CBEES working paper, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.
  • 9Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. and Piankov, N., 2006, "Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness", Experimental Economics, 9, pp. 193-208.
  • 10Berg, J., Dickaut, J. and McCabe, K., 1995, "Trust, Reciprocity and Social History", Glmes and Economic Behavior, 10.

二级参考文献99

  • 1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量:959
  • 2杨中芳,彭泗清.中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点[J].社会学研究,1999(2):3-23. 被引量:554
  • 3杨宜音.“自己人”:信任建构过程的个案研究[J].社会学研究,1999(2):40-54. 被引量:223
  • 4王飞雪,山岸俊男.信任的中、日、美比较研究[J].社会学研究,1999(2):69-84. 被引量:149
  • 5Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
  • 6Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
  • 7Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
  • 8Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.
  • 9Kurzban, R., and Houser, D., 2005, “Experiments Investigating Cooperative Types in Humans: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulations”, PNAS, 102: 1803-1807.
  • 10Laury, S.K., Walker, J.M., and Williams A.W., 1999, "The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good with Diminishing Marginal Returns", Public Choice, 99: 139-160.

共引文献119

同被引文献882

引证文献53

二级引证文献450

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部