文体学视野中的“连珠”定位

On the stylistic orientation of Lianzhu

连珠被《文选》立类,确立了其文体地位,但《文心雕龙》归之入"杂文",又模糊了其文体地位,而历代的连珠作品以其短小的体制,对偶的句式,假喻以达旨的手法,讽谏的功用等特征与赋、骈文、隐语、诗歌、箴铭、论说文等文体之间存在着一定的关联和纠葛,从而在文体定位上引发了一定的混淆和争议。

Lianzhu was classified as a literary form by Wen Xuan,which established its stylistic position. However, it was classified as essay by Wen Xin Diao Long,which made its stylistic posistion vague. The characteristics of Lianzhu works in past dynasties such as being short, antithetical sentence patterns, false metaphors and ironical function were realted to other literary forms such as fu, poem, argot,pianwen,etc. ,which has led to some confusion and controversy about style orientation.