期刊文献+

应用浮游植物监测与评价长江口水体营养状况 被引量:5

Monitoring and assessment of water trophic states using phytoplankton community in Changjiang Estuary
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对长江河口浮游植物采样研究,应用浮游植物群落多样性指数和均匀度指数、浮游植物丰度以及生物学综合评价法对长江河口水体营养状况进行监测与评价。生物学综合评价结果显示:1999年枯水期,口门内的SX01~SX04样站表、底层水体为中营养水平,口门外近岸及近外海水域一般为贫营养水体。1999年丰水期,表、底层水质状况与枯水期不同,口门内的SX01~SX04样站水体为贫营养型,近口门、近外海水域为中营养型,近岸中部、东部表层一般达到富营养型水体,近岸底层东北部为富营养型,其余近岸水域为中营养型水体。2000年枯水期水质情况为:口门内表、底层水体为贫营养水体,近岸水域表层为中营养水体,底层为贫营养水体,近外海水域表、底层一般也为贫营养水体。 Based on the samples collected from the Changjiang Estuary, monitoring and assessment of water nutrient states have been made through the methods including diversity index, evenness index, abundance and bioassessment of phytoplankton community. The results by means of the standard of bioassessment of phytoplankton community showed that in the dry period of 1999, the surface and bottom layers of water of stations SX01~SX04 inside the river mouth were a mesotrophic type; and the waters nearshore and offshore outside the river mouth were generally an oligotrophic type. In the wet periods of 1999, the condition of water quality was different from that of water during the dry periods. The waters of stations SX01~SX04 inside the river mouth were an oligotrophic type. The waters near the river mouth and offshore were a mesotrophic type, and the surface layers in the mid-east nearshore generally reached the level of the mesotrophic type; bottom layer in the northeast nearshore was also an eutrophic type; the rest were a mesotrophic type. Such are the water quality conditions in the dry period of 2000. And the surface layers of waters nearshore were a mesotrophic type and the rest were an oligotrophic type.
出处 《海洋科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期68-72,共5页 Marine Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(40231017) 河口海岸国家重点实验室开放基金项目(200409) 华侨大学高层次人才科研启动基金资助项目(04BS312)
关键词 浮游植物 富营养化 水质评价 长江口 phytoplankton Eutrophication assessment of water quality Changjiang Estuary
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lavoie I, Campeau S, Fallu M A, et al. Diatoms and biomonitoring., should cell size be accounted for? [J].Hydrobiologia, 2006, 573: 1-16 .
  • 2Oberholster P J, Botha A M, Cloete T E. Using a battery of bioassays, benthic phytoplankton and the AUS RIVAS method to monitor long-term coal tar contaminated sediment in the Cache la Poudre River, Colorado [J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(20): 4 913-4 924.
  • 3Bulgakov N G, Abakumov V A, Maximov V N, et al. Technical aspects of using rank distributions of phyto- plankton abundance for the analysis of mass data of freshwater ecological monitoring. Approximate calculations [J].Biology Bulletin, 2005, 32(6):597 -603.
  • 4Paerl H W, Valdes L M, Pinekney J L, et al. Phytoplankton photopigments as indicators of estuarine and coastal eutrophication [J]. Bioseienee, 2003, 53(10): 953-964.
  • 5Arhonditsis G, Karydis M, Tsirtsis G. Analysis of phytoplankton community structure using similarity indices: A new methodology for discriminating among eutrophication levels in coastal marine ecosystems[J]. Environmental Management, 2003, 31 (5) : 619-632.
  • 6蔡文贵,李纯厚,贾晓平,林钦,甘居利.粤西海域浮游植物群落结构特征的多元分析与评价[J].水生生物学报,2007,31(2):155-161. 被引量:20
  • 7张乃群,杜敏华,庞振凌,李玉英,胡兰群.南水北调中线水源区浮游植物与水质评价[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(4):650-654. 被引量:27
  • 8赵先富,于军,葛建华,刘国祥,胡征宇.青岛棘洪滩水库浮游藻类状况及水质评价[J].水生生物学报,2005,29(6):639-644. 被引量:36
  • 9况琪军,胡征宇,周广杰,叶麟,蔡庆华.香溪河流域浮游植物调查与水质评价[J].武汉植物学研究,2004,22(6):507-513. 被引量:112
  • 10国家技术监督局.海洋调查规范海洋生物调查(GB12763.6-91)[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1991.

二级参考文献70

共引文献455

同被引文献137

引证文献5

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部