期刊文献+

基于马尔科夫转换模型的城镇居民消费行为研究 被引量:4

The Research on the Consumption Behavior of China's Urban Residents and the Wealth Effects Based on Markov Regime Switching Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 居民消费不足一直是近年来影响我国经济持续稳定发展的隐患。本文采用双区制马尔科夫转换模型对我国城镇居民的消费行为进行的实证考察发现,居民可支配收入是影响居民消费的主要因素,但房地产资产并不具备显著的财富效应,而股票市场不仅没有财富效应,反而对居民消费具有一定的挤出效应。我们认为,股票市场之所以对居民消费具有挤出效应,并不是因为居民消费对股票财富不敏感,而是由于长期以来居民从股市中得到的资产性收入少。因此,拉动居民消费需求不仅应该提高其可支配收入,更应该让居民从股市中感受到真实的财富增值。 The deficiency of household consumption has been the pitfall that affects the stable and sustainable development of China's economy. In this paper we employ a Markov switching model with two regimes to study the consumption behavior of China's urban residents, and the empirical results find that the residents' disposable income is the major factor that affects the household consumption, but the real estate assets do not have a significant wealth effect, and the stock market crowds out the consumption to some extent, rather than has any wealth effects. We believe that the reason of the crowding--out effect of the stock market is not that the consumption is insensitive to the stock wealth, but the residents have gained little assets returns in the long term. Therefore, to promote the household consumption needs not only to increase the residents' disposable income, but also to let them feel the real appreciated value from the stock market.
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期8-13,共6页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"金融市场全球化下的中国金融监管体系研究"(07JZD0010) 福建省社科基金规划项目"我国财政支出的动态 非均衡增长效应与通货膨胀风险研究"(2009B064) 福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才支持计划(07FJRC06)
关键词 居民消费 财富效应 马尔科夫转换模型 household consumption wealth effect Markov Regime Switching Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Benjamin, J. , P. Chinloy & D. Jud. Real Estate versus Financial Wealth in Consumption[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2004, (29).
  • 2Campbell, J. & N. Gregory Mankiw. The Response of Consumption to Incom: a cross--country investingation[J]. European Economic Review, 1991, (35).
  • 3Case K. E. , J. M. Quigley & R. J. SMiler. Comparing Wealth Effects: The Stock Market versus the Housing Market[J]. Advances in Macroeconomics, 2005,5, (1).
  • 4Deaton, A. Life--Cycle Models of Consumption: Is the Evidence Consistent with the Theory? [R]. in Truman Bewley (ed.), Advances in Econometric, Fifth World Congress, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987, (2) .
  • 5Tan, A. & G. Voss. Consumption and Wealth in Australia[J]. Economic Record,2003,(79).
  • 6Fernandez Corugedo, E. , Price, S. & A. Blake. The Dynamics of Consumer Expenditure: the UK Consumption ECM Redux[R]. Bank of England, Working Paper, 2003, (204).
  • 7Fisher, L. & G. Voss. Consumption, Wealth and Expected Returns in Australia[J]. The Economic Record, 2004, (80).
  • 8Lettau, M. & S. Ludvigson. Consumption, Aggregate Wealth and Stock Returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2001, (56).
  • 9Marjorie Flavin. The Adjustment of Consumption to Changing Expectations about Future Income[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1981, (89).
  • 10Robert E. Hall. Stochastic Implications of Life Cycle--Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1978,86,(5).

二级参考文献36

共引文献174

同被引文献46

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部