摘要
罗隆基把思想言论自由作为一项重要的人权来争取,反对思想统一运动,主张思想言论自由,其目的就是提倡一种对政府批评的言论自由。在论述中罗隆基用功利主义理论来解释思想言论自由的作用,但并未严格区分思想自由与言论自由的界限。思想自由是一种绝对的自由,而言论自由并不是一种绝对权利,必须接受法律的限制。
Luo Longji strived for both free thought and free speech as an important part of human rights. His purpose was to oppose the movement of thought unification, and against the oppression of free thought and free speech. His advocacy of both freedoms was to support a freedom of criticism against the govemment. He dissertated the function of both freedoms with Benthamism, but failed to strictly distinguish the limits between free thought and free speech. Free thought is an absolute freedom, yet free speech is not an absolute right and it must be restricted by the law.
出处
《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第11期3-7,共5页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
广州市属高校科技计划项目(课题编号:08B042)
